From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752548AbbJTI3d (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:29:33 -0400 Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:42241 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752031AbbJTI2k (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:28:40 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-f3-5625fb13ec45 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] drivers: soc: add support for exynos SROM driver To: Pavel Fedin , "'Pankaj Dubey'" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1445255206-11148-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1445255206-11148-7-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <56258683.7070204@samsung.com> <5625B92C.10505@samsung.com> <5625C07D.4030706@samsung.com> <014301d10b01$488873f0$d9995bd0$@samsung.com> <5625E3B9.8040707@samsung.com> <021201d10b0f$b273bf00$175b3d00$@samsung.com> Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com From: Krzysztof Kozlowski X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-id: <5625FB0E.2000109@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:27:58 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <021201d10b0f$b273bf00$175b3d00$@samsung.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xy7rCv1XDDJYf0bN4/cLQonfBVTaL TY+vsVpc3jWHzWLG+X1MFq8urWKzWLT1C7tFxzJGBw6PzUvqPfq2rGL0+LxJLoA5issmJTUn syy1SN8ugSvj1v7AgpPsFedO9TM1ME5g62Lk5JAQMJHo37mRGcIWk7hwbz1QnItDSGApo8TU l0+YQBJCAl8YJU780ACxhQV8JM6u+cACUiQisJtR4vCaFYwQHY+ZJNb9fAA2ilnAQOLHzQaw bjYBY4nNy5dArZOT6O2exAJi8wpoSZzfcAasnkVAVWL51NVgcVGBCImJExpYIWoEJX5MvgcW 5xSwkmjb9xdoGQfQfD2J+xe1IFbJS2xe85Z5AqPgLCQdsxCqZiGpWsDIvIpRNLU0uaA4KT3X SK84Mbe4NC9dLzk/dxMjJNS/7mBceszqEKMAB6MSD69GjGqYEGtiWXFl7iFGCQ5mJRHeZyeA QrwpiZVVqUX58UWlOanFhxilOViUxHln7nofIiSQnliSmp2aWpBaBJNl4uCUagAaO1Egizlh x/TEzNUFYQ5vj3yZqeS8vXVx4QKWTR4Om2ufsAiWFX5JevXx3Ju5CyzD4/pK/tyzXrjtIXe7 RXbqex7rkEUB1z5vkNdzi/5qs/9y1Hv52zEXHgUtWJ/QUzDb4eVPH+kTjzmmzP/JX2wQYuxW WNolo3H5X7ne85kZCQLfJDvPPFRiKc5INNRiLipOBAD4YIiwcQIAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20.10.2015 17:17, Pavel Fedin wrote: > Hello! > >>> Pin controller is needed in order to configure multi-functional pins correctly. >> >> Are there any obstacles for upstreaming it? > > I don't know. The last post on this topic is from March, 2015: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html. Patch 0003 has been acked-by, and nothing more since > that. > Actually, only 0002 and 0003 of this series are needed for the pin controller. 0001 has been accepted > (27284129522e7e2a5b89e80bd44ea3345f79c9e8). I see that all objections were solved and I already reviewed all of the patches. This was sent before I started collecting patches as co-maintainer so all it is needed now is to rebase and resend with collected tags. I'll try to find them in my archives and apply. Really, if you have anything waiting then just resend/ping. Things changed since May this year :) . Best regards, Krzysztof