From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752091AbbJTSMk (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:12:40 -0400 Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.59.15.196]:7977 "EHLO mailapp01.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751178AbbJTSMi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:12:38 -0400 Message-ID: <56268411.1080307@imgtec.com> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:12:33 -0700 From: Leonid Yegoshin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markos Chandras , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] MIPS64: signal: n64 kernel bugfix of MIPS32 o32 ABI sigaction syscall References: <20151019183955.6212.78229.stgit@ubuntu-yegoshin> <5625FCDE.9010608@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <5625FCDE.9010608@imgtec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.20.3.92] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/20/2015 01:35 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > What tree did you use for this patch? It does not seem to apply to > mainline or Ralf's upstream-sfr. May I ask you to elaborate more and send me a concern details? I definitely rebased it to mips-for-linux-next of upstream-sfr from LMO. - Leonid