From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752207AbbJWOm0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:42:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.220.48]:34484 "EHLO mail-pa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751256AbbJWOmY (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:42:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper To: Peter Zijlstra References: <1445559014-4667-1-git-send-email-ast@kernel.org> <20151023120335.GZ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Wang Nan , He Kuang , Kaixu Xia , Daniel Borkmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alexei Starovoitov Message-ID: <562A474E.6040401@plumgrid.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:42:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151023120335.GZ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/23/15 5:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > So the bpf_perf_event_read() returns the count value, does this not also > mean that returning -EINVAL here is also 'wrong'? > > I mean, sure an actual count value that high is unlikely, but its still > a broken interface. Agree. that's not pretty interface. I wish I looked at it more carefully when it was introduced. Now it's too late to change.