From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752617AbbJZVcX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:32:23 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46856 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751429AbbJZVcW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:32:22 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] coccinelle: ifnullfree: improve and extend ifnullfree
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
References: <1445102605-22408-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
 <56236C9A.8060906@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>, Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Message-ID: <562E9BE3.5080004@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:32:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56236C9A.8060906@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Dne 18.10.2015 v 11:55 SF Markus Elfring napsal(a):
>> Remove removal and re-addition of freeing functions.
> 
> I find such a wording confusing for a commit message.

It is also a bit confusing to use the same subject for two patches in a
series. How about

[PATCH 1/2] coccinelle: ifnullfree: Adjust tests to compare against NULL
[PATCH 2/2] coccinelle: ifnullfree: handle various destroy functions

?

Michal