From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753350AbbJZWOu (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:14:50 -0400 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:53270 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752110AbbJZWOt (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:14:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Enable Cadence driver for ARM64 To: Lee Jones References: <893f828f3ac665d80746589af3617dc462315329.1445868589.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com> <20151026143236.GK597@x1> <20151026144425.GA5588@katana> <20151026150048.GO597@x1> <562E416B.8@osg.samsung.com> <20151026164559.GP597@x1> Cc: Wolfram Sang , Michal Simek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, Andrew Bresticker , David Box , Kamal Dasu , Joachim Eastwood , Zhangfei Gao , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Neelesh Gupta , Subhendu Sekhar Behera From: Javier Martinez Canillas X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <562EA5D2.5030503@osg.samsung.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 07:14:42 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151026164559.GP597@x1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Lee, On 10/27/2015 01:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On 10/27/2015 12:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> Regarding your address list -- it's too big. Most of your addressees >>>>> don't care about this patch. Please be more selective when sending >>>>> patches to people, most of us have enough (relevant) mail as it is. >>>> >>>> Probably more effective than to write every user of get_maintainer.pl: >>>> Patch it to not use git history by default and win the fight ;) >>> >> >> Agreed, coincidentally I was telling people today that get_maintainers.pl >> only provides a suggestion and that it should not be followed blindly. >> >>> Geert wrote to Joe today. Let's see if he can improve things. >>> >> >> What about something like the following patch until Joe writes a more >> smarter git fallback version? >> >> From d6dc34810d24f33afb3c158d519966c1b6167a2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Javier Martinez Canillas >> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:46:52 +0900 >> Subject: [RFC PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default >> >> The get_maintainer.pl script could be used to get a list of people that >> has to be in the copy list when posting patches for a given file but it >> defaults to git fallback so the list returned isn't really relevant and >> submitters are posting patches to random developers that just happened >> to touch that file in the past. >> >> Disable git fallback so get_maintainer.pl only returns the information >> that is in MAINTAINERS by default. >> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas >> --- >> scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Works for me. Although you should have used get_maintainer.pl and > CC'ed Joe. ;) > hehe, yes. I first wanted to share with Wolfram and you to see if that is what you were thinking about and that is why I didn't add Joe and marked the patch as RFC. I posted it as a proper patch now and also added a Suggested-by tag from Wolfram. > I never did this before -- it was both odd and fun: > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f scripts/get_maintainer.pl > Joe Perches (maintainer:GET_MAINTAINER SCRIPT) > Fun indeed. [0]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7492371/ Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America