linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com, wsa@the-dreams.de,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:13:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5630CA06.7050503@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151028095524.GP5828@x1>

W dniu 28.10.2015 o 18:55, Lee Jones pisze:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 06:23:37PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 28.10.2015 17:24, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> You guys are pushing back like this is some kind of demotion.
>>>> That's not the case at all.  All it does is better describe the (very
>>>> worthy) function you *actually* provide.
>>>
>>> It is getting into dispute about entire change of yours... which is not
>>> what I want. I agree with your general idea but I was referring only to
>>> that particular case - the Samsung PMICs (and Maxim PMICs/MUICs which
>>> would fall into same category).
>>
>> Not being affected by this change, I wonder what the technical
>> difference is if someone is listed as reviewer instead of maintainer.
>> Does get_maintainer.pl behave differently?
> 
> Reviewers are people who should be Cc'ed on all patches, as are
> Maintainers, so no, fundamentally they are treated the same by a
> Submitter.
> 
> Here is some output for Maintainers/Reviews from get_maintainer.pl.
> 
>  $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500.dtsi
>  Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> (maintainer:ARM/FREESCALE VYBRID ARM ARCHITECTURE)
>  Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de> (maintainer:ARM/FREESCALE VYBRID ARM ARCHITECTURE)
>  Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> (reviewer)
>  Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> (maintainer:ARM PORT)
>  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE VYBRID ARM ARCHITECTURE)
>  devicetree@vger.kernel.org (open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS)
>  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
> 
> I'm sure we can make the output even more similar by listing the
> MAINTAINERS tag after "reviewer" too.

And here is the output of drivers/mfd/sec-core.c *before*:
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com> (supporter:SAMSUNG MULTIFUNCTION PMIC DEVICE DRIVERS)
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> (supporter:SAMSUNG MULTIFUNCTION PMIC DEVICE DRIVERS)
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> (supporter:MULTIFUNCTION DEVICES (MFD))


and after (where I am listed as reviewer):
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com> (reviewer)
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> (reviewer)
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> (supporter:MULTIFUNCTION DEVICES (MFD))

Maybe it should be "supporter reviewer"?

Best regards,
Krzysztof


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-28 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-27 15:42 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 18:15   ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:44     ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28  1:46       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28  8:24         ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28  9:21           ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28  9:25             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28  9:31             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:28             ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:53               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:06                 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:25                   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:39                     ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14                       ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:20                         ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:24                           ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:46                             ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 13:06                         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:34                           ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:09                             ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:38                               ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:54                                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 23:56                                 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-29  0:12                                   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-30 16:51                                     ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51                                   ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28  9:23           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28  9:39             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-10-28  9:55               ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:13                 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-10-28 16:41                   ` [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add subsystem to reviewer output Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:01                     ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:08                       ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:22                         ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:30                           ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:49                             ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:56                               ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29  9:20                                 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 14:14                                   ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 16:17                                     ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:18                       ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 23:49                     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:14             ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:27               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:49                 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:26           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:33             ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28  8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5630CA06.7050503@samsung.com \
    --to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski.k@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).