From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:56:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563160B2.7070305@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151028143838.GG4058@x1>
On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer
>> that doesn't seem what most people agree with.
>
> "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be
> Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but
> are rather Reviewers. I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far
> that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not. Unsurprisingly the ones that
> agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition)
> Reviewers -- go figure.
>
I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :)
If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that
maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any
problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review.
In that case, that would be:
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 15:42 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-27 17:24 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-10-27 18:15 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-27 18:44 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 1:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 8:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:21 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 9:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:28 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 10:53 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 11:25 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 11:39 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:14 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:20 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 12:24 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 12:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 13:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 13:34 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:09 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 14:38 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 14:54 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-28 23:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-10-29 0:12 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-30 16:51 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 9:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-10-28 9:55 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:13 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 16:41 ` [PATCH] get_maintainer: Add subsystem to reviewer output Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:01 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:08 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:22 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:30 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 17:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:56 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-29 14:14 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-29 16:17 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 17:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-10-28 23:49 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 10:14 ` [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag Lee Jones
2015-10-28 13:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 13:49 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 16:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-10-28 16:33 ` Lee Jones
2015-10-28 8:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563160B2.7070305@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).