From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756490AbbJ1X4r (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:56:47 -0400 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:46018 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754117AbbJ1X4q (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:56:46 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-66-563160bb5040 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag To: Lee Jones , Javier Martinez Canillas References: <20151028102832.GR5828@x1> <1446030399.2757.83.camel@perches.com> <20151028113932.GS5828@x1> <20151028121454.GA4058@x1> <20151028133438.GC4058@x1> <20151028143838.GG4058@x1> Cc: Joe Perches , Wolfram Sang , Linus Walleij , Sebastian Reichel , Linux Kernel , Chanwoo Choi , Mark Brown , Ben Dooks , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" From: Krzysztof Kozlowski X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-id: <563160B2.7070305@samsung.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:56:34 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20151028143838.GG4058@x1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7q7EwzDDHZtV7CYtO4Ak8XUh0/Y LK5/ec5qce33DDaL2fcfs1i8fmFocf/rUUaLKX+WM1lsenyN1eLyrjlsFqd3l1isPDGL2YHH 4+/sVmaPv6teMHtsWtXJ5nHn2h42j81L6j2+rLrG7NG3ZRWjx8lTT1g8Pm+SC+CM4rJJSc3J LEst0rdL4Mo4PHcxc8FT9oojLU/YGhjnsHUxcnJICJhINE84xgJhi0lcuLceKM7FISSwlFHi 4t1vjBDOF0aJxR/PMIJUCQu4SLxb3ssMYosIhEn8v/gGqmMZi8TVpd/AHGaB/0wSO25dYwKp YhMwlti8fAnUPjmJ3u5JYPt4BbQknp7+BDaJRUBVYn1bMzuILSoQITFxQgMrRI2gxI/J98Dq OQXUJaZN2gE0kwNogbrElCm5IGFmAXmJzWveMk9gFJyFpGMWQtUsJFULGJlXMYqmliYXFCel 5xrqFSfmFpfmpesl5+duYoTE1JcdjIuPWR1iFOBgVOLhXWBkGCbEmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhFea BSjEm5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyIUZqDRUmcd+6u9yFCAumJJanZqakFqUUwWSYOTqkGxsLPaUuc ak+yrrdaYDHn/OGtJidLLv+9ufzc8ped2Y9zdFdoRSmVlb79rLvtnc0jvZOfprsJ5O/amSCR 0Sf/xlM3qWLJvHLPFZzB6z6wV17+JXLrwoSz9zRaRXw5Q5ctDNjA9cMozdhtycWIt4aPJFVL Tst9fytwpW7KQ8GDYjuZnzq/PG0Y8EmJpTgj0VCLuag4EQCTN992pQIAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer >> that doesn't seem what most people agree with. > > "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be > Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but > are rather Reviewers. I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far > that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not. Unsurprisingly the ones that > agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition) > Reviewers -- go figure. > I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :) If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review. In that case, that would be: Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof