Re: [PATCH 1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy_pad mechanisms

Julia Lawall
2019-07-25T13:48:37Z

On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:

> > @r@
> > identifier f,i1,i2;
> > struct i1 e1;
> > expression e2;
> > position p;
> > @@
> > \(strscpy\|strlcpy\)(e1.f, e2, i2)@p
>
> I have got the impression that the replacement can work also
> without an inherited position variable at the end.
> How do you think about to omit this SmPL rule then?
>
> Can it be nicer to reduce duplicate SmPL code a bit?

Huh? Rule 2 is important, to ensure that ths size is correct. Without
rule 1, how can rule 2 be checked?

julia