From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751702AbbJaFck (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 31 Oct 2015 01:32:40 -0400
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:55281 "EHLO
	szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751016AbbJaFcj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 31 Oct 2015 01:32:39 -0400
Message-ID: <5634523B.8060109@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 13:31:39 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
CC: <ast@plumgrid.com>, <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>, <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <dsahern@gmail.com>, <hekuang@huawei.com>,
        <jolsa@kernel.org>, <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        <paulus@samba.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@163.com>,
        <xiakaixu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/31] perf test: Enforce LLVM test for BPF test
References: <1444826502-49291-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <1444826502-49291-11-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> <20151029223744.GK2923@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151029223744.GK2923@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.111.66.109]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
	refid=str=0001.0A0B0202.56345254.006D,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
	ip=0.0.0.0,
	so=2013-05-26 15:14:31,
	dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 99002837bf2826578e72be7a497e2612
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 2015/10/30 6:37, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:41:21PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>> This patch replaces the original toy BPF program with previous introduced
>> bpf-script-example.c. Dynamically embedded it into 'llvm-src.c'.
>>
>> The newly introduced BPF program attaches a BPF program at
>> 'sys_epoll_pwait()', and collect half samples from it. perf itself never
> "collect half samples from it"? Can you rephrase this?

I mean half of epoll_pwait syscall will be captured. This test
case totally issue 111 calls.

Thank you.