Re: livepatch: old_name@old_addr scheme in livepatch sysfs directory

[Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>]

On 10/31/2015 08:53 PM, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Chris J Arges [30/10/15 22:44 -0500]:
>> The following directory structure will allow for cases when the same
>> function name exists in a single object.
>>     /sys/kernel/livepatch/<patch>/<object>/<function@address>
> 
> Hi Chris, thanks for the patch.
> 
> I think the last time this issue was discussed, the conclusion was
> that concatenating the address to the function name constitutes as an
> information leak (as the sysfs entry is visible to non-root users).
> 
> One option suggested by Josh in that thread would be to do something
> like "func.n", where n is just the nth occurrence of the symbol name.
> Another option might be to keep the func@addr format but not make these
> entries visible to non-root users.
> 
> Jessica
> 

Jessica,

Makes sense to me. Is there a reason why the sysfs entries are visible
to non-root users?

Otherwise, if there is a use-case for keeping the permissions the same,
then I'd be happy to to use the 'func.n' format for v2.

--chris