public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [x86/context_tracking] db23da8b95: inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:19:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563754C8.5060202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151102121154.GB8833@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>

Hi Fengguang,

this patch is not ready, and is left for 4.5; see Andy's comment at
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2072877.  Only the other
two are.

I'm sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks,

Paolo

On 02/11/2015 13:11, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> FYI, here is another bisect result.
> 
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux Paolo-Bonzini/context_tracking-remove-duplicate-enabled-check/20151028-094317
> 
> commit db23da8b95ece9b57d4cfd63f5ee10502f1af0c8
> Author:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> AuthorDate: Wed Oct 28 02:39:57 2015 +0100
> Commit:     0day robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> CommitDate: Wed Oct 28 09:43:20 2015 +0800
> 
>     x86: context_tracking: avoid irq_save/irq_restore on kernel entry and exit
>     
>     x86 always calls user_enter and user_exit with interrupt disabled.
>     Therefore, it is not necessary to check for exceptions, nor to
>     save/restore the IRQ state, when context tracking functions are
>     called by guest_enter and guest_exit.
>     
>     Use the previously introduced __context_tracking_entry and
>     __context_tracking_exit.
>     
>     Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>     Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
>     Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>     Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-02 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-29  4:54 [lkp] [x86] db23da8b95: BUG: using __this_cpu_add_return() in preemptible [00000000] code: init/1 kernel test robot
2015-11-02 12:11 ` [x86/context_tracking] db23da8b95: inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage Fengguang Wu
2015-11-02 12:19   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-11-02 12:25     ` [LKP] " Fengguang Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=563754C8.5060202@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox