From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: "dmaengine@vger.kernel.org" <dmaengine@vger.kernel.org>,
timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:51:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5638D81B.2010303@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gDy17WuV_f=t77v_Gw+6vihkHXpE8TRBjgnkvjZPgYEA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/3/2015 2:44 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 11:18:37PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/2/2015 11:15 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:07:38AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds supporting utility functions
>>>>> for selftest. The intention is to share the self
>>>>> test code between different drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Supported test cases include:
>>>>> 1. dma_map_single
>>>>> 2. streaming DMA
>>>>> 3. coherent DMA
>>>>> 4. scatter-gather DMA
>>>>
>>>> This seems quite similar to dmatest, any reason why you cannot use/enhance
>>>> that?
>>>>
>>> Dmatest is a standalone kernel module intended for stress testing
>>> DMA engines from userspace with N number of threads and M size
>>> combinations etc.
>>>
>>> This one; on the other hand, is selftest to verify hardware is
>>> working as expected during power up.
>>>
>>> Almost all DMA engine drivers come with some sort of selftest code
>>> called from probe. I followed the same design pattern.
>>
>> which ones ?
>>
>>>
>>> I think the goal is to remove the duplicate self test code in all
>>> drivers over time.
>>
>> and what prevents us from having common selftest plus dmatest code. Most of
>> the code here to do selftest is _same_ dmaengine routine code used in
>> dmatest
>>
>> We can have common code which is used for dmatest as well as selftest. I do
>> not want to see same code duplicated..
>
> Originally ioatdma and iop-adma had local self tests before Haavard
> created dmatest. I agree having the drivers also do a test each boot
> is redundant, but then again dmatest is not automatic and I saw the
> local self test catch an interrupt setup regression.
I see the following files still have some sort of self test code in them.
ioat\dma.c
ioat\dma_v2.c
ioat\dma_v3.c
iop-adma.c
mv_xor.c
>
> Maybe you could arrange for drivers to do a quick autorun through
> dmatest on load if dmatest is enabled, but otherwise load without
> testing? Just my 2 cents from a dmaengine spectator.
>
I'm on the same boat. Almost all kernel configurations that I have seen
do not have dmatest enabled. Dmatest is considered debug only and is not
included into the kernel binaries.
I have no problem for moving the code from one location to the other but
I still want to be able to run self-test code in mission mode before
enabling DMA as today.
I'm open to suggestions.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1446444460-21600-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
2015-11-02 6:07 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver Sinan Kaya
2015-11-02 15:57 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-02 16:20 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-02 17:26 ` Timur Tabi
2015-11-02 17:42 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-02 17:48 ` Timur Tabi
2015-11-02 18:25 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-02 18:30 ` Timur Tabi
2015-11-05 14:31 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-05 14:43 ` Timur Tabi
2015-11-02 18:49 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-02 22:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-03 5:18 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-03 10:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-04 0:47 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-02 6:07 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions Sinan Kaya
2015-11-03 4:15 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-03 4:18 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-03 6:30 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-03 7:44 ` Dan Williams
2015-11-03 8:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-03 16:08 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-05 2:42 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-05 12:05 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-05 16:17 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-07 6:23 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-08 13:53 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-13 20:20 ` okaya
2015-11-03 15:51 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2015-11-03 16:06 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-03 14:31 ` Timur Tabi
2015-11-03 16:10 ` Vinod Koul
2015-11-03 16:28 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-03 16:46 ` Timur Tabi
2015-11-03 16:57 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-03 16:48 ` Timur Tabi
2015-11-02 6:07 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA channel driver Sinan Kaya
2015-11-03 10:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-04 0:07 ` Sinan Kaya
2015-11-04 17:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-05 2:22 ` Sinan Kaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5638D81B.2010303@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox