public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephan Müller" <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] crypto: DRBG - track whether DRBG was seeded with !rng_is_initialized()
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:41:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56392671.GheZNe4kVQ@positron.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025092525.12805-3-nstange@suse.de>

Am Montag, 25. Oktober 2021, 11:25:21 CEST schrieb Nicolai Stange:

Hi Nicolai,

> Currently, the DRBG implementation schedules asynchronous works from
> random_ready_callbacks for reseeding the DRBG instances with output from
> get_random_bytes() once the latter has sufficient entropy available.
> 
> However, as the get_random_bytes() initialization state can get queried by
> means of rng_is_initialized() now, there is no real need for this
> asynchronous reseeding logic anymore and it's better to keep things simple
> by doing it synchronously when needed instead, i.e. from drbg_generate()
> once rng_is_initialized() has flipped to true.
> 
> Of course, for this to work, drbg_generate() would need some means by which
> it can tell whether or not rng_is_initialized() has flipped to true since
> the last seeding from get_random_bytes(). Or equivalently, whether or not
> the last seed from get_random_bytes() has happened when
> rng_is_initialized() was still evaluating to false.
> 
> As it currently stands, enum drbg_seed_state allows for the representation
> of two different DRBG seeding states: DRBG_SEED_STATE_UNSEEDED and
> DRBG_SEED_STATE_FULL. The former makes drbg_generate() to invoke a full
> reseeding operation involving both, the rather expensive jitterentropy as
> well as the get_random_bytes() randomness sources. The DRBG_SEED_STATE_FULL
> state on the other hand implies that no reseeding at all is required for a
> !->pr DRBG variant.
> 
> Introduce the new DRBG_SEED_STATE_PARTIAL state to enum drbg_seed_state for
> representing the condition that a DRBG was being seeded when
> rng_is_initialized() had still been false. In particular, this new state
> implies that
> - the given DRBG instance has been fully seeded from the jitterentropy
>   source (if enabled)
> - and drbg_generate() is supposed to reseed from get_random_bytes()
>   *only* once rng_is_initialized() turns to true.
> 
> Up to now, the __drbg_seed() helper used to set the given DRBG instance's
> ->seeded state to constant DRBG_SEED_STATE_FULL. Introduce a new argument
> allowing for the specification of the to be written ->seeded value instead.
> Make the first of its two callers, drbg_seed(), determine the appropriate
> value based on rng_is_initialized(). The remaining caller,
> drbg_async_seed(), is known to get invoked only once rng_is_initialized()
> is true, hence let it pass constant DRBG_SEED_STATE_FULL for the new
> argument to __drbg_seed().
> 
> There is no change in behaviour, except for that the pr_devel() in
> drbg_generate() would now report "unseeded" for ->pr DRBG instances which
> had last been seeded when rng_is_initialized() was still evaluating to
> false.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>

Reviewed-by: Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de>

Ciao
Stephan



  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-26  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-25  9:25 [PATCH 0/6] crypto: DRBG - improve 'nopr' reseeding Nicolai Stange
2021-10-25  9:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] crypto: DRBG - prepare for more fine-grained tracking of seeding state Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26  8:37   ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25  9:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] crypto: DRBG - track whether DRBG was seeded with !rng_is_initialized() Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26  8:41   ` Stephan Müller [this message]
2021-10-25  9:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] crypto: DRBG - move dynamic ->reseed_threshold adjustments to __drbg_seed() Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26  9:05   ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25  9:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] crypto: DRBG - make reseeding from get_random_bytes() synchronous Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26  9:19   ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-27  9:19     ` Nicolai Stange
2021-10-27 18:44       ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25  9:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] crypto: DRBG - make drbg_prepare_hrng() handle jent instantiation errors Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26  9:19   ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-25  9:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] crypto: DRBG - reseed 'nopr' drbgs periodically from get_random_bytes() Nicolai Stange
2021-10-26  9:33   ` Stephan Müller
2021-10-26  8:33 ` [PATCH 0/6] crypto: DRBG - improve 'nopr' reseeding Stephan Müller
2021-10-27  8:40   ` Nicolai Stange
2021-10-27 18:43     ` Stephan Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56392671.GheZNe4kVQ@positron.chronox.de \
    --to=smueller@chronox.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=duwe@suse.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nstange@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox