From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161338AbbKFMz5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 07:55:57 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:61456 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932747AbbKFMzz (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 07:55:55 -0500 Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-i915: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "pwm_put" To: Jani Nikula , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <563CA07D.30805@users.sourceforge.net> <87h9kzl27o.fsf@intel.com> Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <563CA349.7030004@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 13:55:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h9kzl27o.fsf@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:1Z7AVXEFUZgYVtrId3e6/OmDTz6ItrfDw7XLu9Rk2G2eSrtjkEI QvanP4YcHBuzUXIOVQr1Lrk3spz/hoFiW/dZ1SuAumuSr86PJOTPHDQ2iKy5ElHEUpOUNMS mSomqZzG1lbJdS2vmTrZsmhkzYbMU17ZUrI0CM4Pbtazhbxxk7EqM9NQ59WJrV3zvmRtmbN 5ho2SRaPMK90Joa9mWn5w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:4vRm7fE8avI=:G1Q9PZ8BBjfD8X6eZZP2Zt ILoNA/BL2Pc+3fwdEJ4/NQZuRulvkeSv5e522LFqGnyANdKHZ1TvcC/yvq+1uVemnlv7P2Yh+ 8Smx5loQslJUKveKHojWlUF7FAQnKkWP1SuLE9HM5QxPCzfxnyOJwrIRJk0D/92yqswYVp3du PyeTB4dt946j2nI3pVS8AyJNhTJL3kL7wcRigpucu33XnTRSGqlTOSeDSZKcI5Na/yqtxIXhb Zu2cYmLxH7PWMJBdhmv5NtM5fTB77T4aehmpIctO+qnMJY/Zu8CGNe2Y4KFdcoLNeeMG8L2g2 kGRUfOkuyWmubyJJj7sS7Dapsgm+J6ZZwRfiOtBymjK2Cq4zaFYNAI+iIhhXpYyHC3TGrfJdb vFuU+E/ijJgSlEHhpAU5Fua4oFpigGyI1rTy8kNQh2lxIReS0cZwe51PPt5csAC5BtN8B31AL M9AAh1Ya60EXoBORJyWxSBQ+fNMae2rYiRbnS93Q1UM1yZXVKX686ridHJO4EycfC7kk0rS/f jnLSGo28sYlViWMJu1PuCRTtLzk4LVTTgbZ5k56vf0yB57aGfUSXZ9M8e+AXVB7hDOiL1k2Ei IrG7NQrHtgaOby3Ae0TSHyeYc0fOInM2Id/XO2sGgsCRHnXSrGk0L7AxHxLuEVmRSRCg0EmQK yH30GCTxXEelQdk+Vjfnvau45X9gepCrgkHbRGLwTf1+CK3vaazivKMVghOo5gwdOPmMcBa37 miM3+JoTDFX9OVvlaZGB7EEp6wAOPlI090e2yvE84TNgG7ihqtHHx8fvhZ9VSRGJkBesCgSEk 0Wbwuhm Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> The pwm_put() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then >> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. > > The compiler doesn't need it, but IMO it's useful documentation for humans. How do you think about to extend the explicit documentation for the affected parameters in the Linux programming interfaces? Regards, Markus