From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>,
Havoc Pennington <havoc.pennington@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: kdbus refactoring?
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:28:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5640674A.4030602@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANq1E4R_am38hXZO8EtybdHKigiSowr=YsZWM-+SKKT_N=UqYA@mail.gmail.com>
Am 09.11.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Herrmann:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>>> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel
>>> way'.
>>
>> This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was:
>>
>> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation
>
> ..which was the last time we proposed it for inclusion.
Guys, let's cool down. :-)
What Peter is complaining about is that since the last proposal a lot
of iterative patches and even pull requests were sent instead of
complete patch series.
The expectation was that you send patch series with fixes folded in
as long the review takes.
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-09 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-08 21:06 kdbus refactoring? Richard Weinberger
2015-11-08 21:35 ` Greg KH
2015-11-08 21:39 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-11-08 23:30 ` Greg KH
2015-11-09 0:53 ` Josh Triplett
2015-11-09 8:34 ` David Herrmann
2015-11-09 8:37 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-11-09 8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-09 8:56 ` David Herrmann
2015-11-09 9:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-09 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-09 9:19 ` David Herrmann
2015-11-09 9:28 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2015-11-09 15:02 ` Greg KH
2015-11-09 15:55 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-11-09 8:15 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-11-09 16:51 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-09 17:02 ` Måns Rullgård
2015-11-09 17:07 ` Greg KH
2015-11-09 17:14 ` Måns Rullgård
2015-11-09 17:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-11-12 5:35 ` Kalle A. Sandstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5640674A.4030602@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=havoc.pennington@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=tixxdz@opendz.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox