From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to implement common clk in multi function controller?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:30:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56430AC0.5090707@mleia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNASM+tJpd-kBHGHe7TXWm4i-UEfbq7T3dn99p2fKFwtxAA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Masahiro,
On 11.11.2015 05:16, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am implementing clk and reset drivers for my SoCs.
> (drivers/clk/uniphier/* and drivers/reset/uniphier/*)
>
>
> In my SoCs, one hardware block contains various
> registers for both clock and reset controlling.
> (so, it is like a MFD system controller device).
> I think it is a common case.
>
I met the same problem with LPC32xx clocks, one hardware block
contains clock controller, power controller, wakeup
controllers and partially pinmux and dma configuration.
I've sent a mmio version for review some time ago, but I had
to change interface to regmap recently.
> I am guessing my device tree would be like follows:
> (one syscon device contains clk and rst devices under it)
>
> syscon {
> compatible = "socionext,uniphier-syscon",
> "syscon", "simple-mfd";
> reg = <... ...>;
>
> clk_ctrl {
> .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-clkctrl";
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> };
>
> rst_ctrl {
> .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-rstctrl";
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> };
> };
>
Eventually I implement the same layout, but replace "syscon" and
"simple-mfd" with "simple-bus" only.
For a single interface syscon_node_to_regmap() I don't see a point to
add a dependency on MFD and syscon.
>
> One problem I noticed was,
> we are supposed to use regmap for register access
> if we use syscon.
>
> OTOH, common clk APIs such as clk-gate, clk-divider
> expect simple register access via writel()/readl().
>
> Is it a good idea to expand such APIs to regmap?
It might be a good idea.
>
> Of course, I could my own uniphier/clk-gate.c
> to use regmap as other SoCs do.
>
> But, I think regmap is general demand, so
> I am wondering if it could be supported in common parts.
>
> Or, any other good solution exists?
>
I had to copy low-level parts from clk-gate, clk-divider and clk-mux to
my driver and reimplement them on regmap API, of course I won't call
this as a good solution, but if regmap is unavoidable, that's what remains.
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-11 3:16 How to implement common clk in multi function controller? Masahiro Yamada
2015-11-11 9:30 ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]
2015-11-11 9:47 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56430AC0.5090707@mleia.com \
--to=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox