Re: [PATCH 1/1] rtc: fix type information of rtc-proc

Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2015-11-11T01:10:34Z

Hi, all

I'm sorry. Maybe I didn't describe clearly enough before. These words are finally
shown to the end user. The end user maybe not a programmer, abbreviation word is unsuitable.

cat /proc/driver/rtc

rtc_time : 00:47:43
rtc_date : 2015-11-11
alrm_time : 03:27:58 //alrm_time --> alarm_time
alrm_date : 2015-10-08 //alrm_date --> alarm_date
alarm_IRQ : no
alrm_pending : no //alrm_pending --> alarm_pending
update IRQ enabled : no

On 2015/10/8 17:47, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Display the whole word of "alarm", make it look more comfortable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
> index ffa69e1..ef83f34 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
>
> err = rtc_read_alarm(rtc, &alrm);
> if (err == 0) {
> - seq_printf(seq, "alrm_time\t: ");
> + seq_printf(seq, "alarm_time\t: ");
> if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_hour <= 24)
> seq_printf(seq, "%02d:", alrm.time.tm_hour);
> else
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> else
> seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
>
> - seq_printf(seq, "alrm_date\t: ");
> + seq_printf(seq, "alarm_date\t: ");
> if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_year <= 200)
> seq_printf(seq, "%04d-", alrm.time.tm_year + 1900);
> else
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
> seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
> alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no");
> - seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n",
> + seq_printf(seq, "alarm_pending\t: %s\n",
> alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no");
> seq_printf(seq, "update IRQ enabled\t: %s\n",
> (rtc->uie_rtctimer.enabled) ? "yes" : "no");
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
>
> .
>