public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __i915_spin_request() sucks
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:40:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5644F941.9090505@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5644F850.2060803@kernel.dk>

On 11/12/2015 01:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So a few months ago I got an XPS13 laptop, the one with the high res
> screen. GUI performance was never really that great, I attributed it to
> coming from a more powerful laptop, and the i915 driving a lot of
> pixels. But yesterday I browsed from my wife's macbook, and was blown
> away. Wow, scrolling in chrome SUCKS on the xps13. Not just scrolling,
> basically anything in chrome. Molasses. So I got sick of it, fired up a
> quick perf record, did a bunch of stuff in chrome. No super smoking
> guns, but one thing did stick out - the path leading to
> __i915_spin_request().
>
> So today, I figured I'd try just killing that spin. If it fails, we'll
> punt to normal completions, so easy change. And wow, MASSIVE difference.
> I can now scroll in chrome and not rage! It's like the laptop is 10x
> faster now.
>
> Ran git blame, and found:
>
> commit 2def4ad99befa25775dd2f714fdd4d92faec6e34
> Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Date:   Tue Apr 7 16:20:41 2015 +0100
>
>      drm/i915: Optimistically spin for the request completion
>
> and read the commit message. Doesn't sound that impressive. Especially
> not for something that screws up interactive performance by a LOT.
>
> What's the deal? Revert?

BTW, this:

"Limit the spinning to a single jiffie (~1us) at most"

is totally wrong. I have HZ=100 on my laptop. That's 10ms. 10ms! Even if 
I had HZ=1000, that'd still be 1ms of spinning. That's seriously screwed 
up, guys.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-12 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 20:36 __i915_spin_request() sucks Jens Axboe
2015-11-12 20:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2015-11-12 22:19   ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-12 22:52     ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-12 22:59       ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-13  9:15       ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13 15:12         ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-13 15:36         ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-13 16:13           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-11-13 16:22             ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-13 22:12               ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-13 22:16                 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5644F941.9090505@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox