From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@freescale.com>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: USB_OTG does not depend on PM
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 23:00:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5647698.81XCu85L5D@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874mgkjoh2.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com>
On Tuesday 17 November 2015 15:38:33 Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> > USB_OTG initially depended on USB_SUSPEND, which was later turned into
> > PM_RUNTIME and finally into PM. I don't know at what point the dependency
> > became unnecessary but it appears to work fine without CONFIG_PM now.
> >
> > However, we get lots of warnings in randconfig kernels like:
> >
> > warning: (USB_OTG_FSM && FSL_USB2_OTG && USB_MV_OTG) selects USB_OTG which has unmet direct dependencies (USB_SUPPORT && USB && PM)
> >
> > whenever CONFIG_PM is disabled and something else selects USB_OTG.
> > Let's just drop the dependency to avoid the warnings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > I keep seeing this one in my ARM randconfig test
>
> and how did you test this ? Did you make sure you're not breaking HNP ?
> For HNP to happen we depend on a bus_suspend and bus_suspend is only
> available on CONFIG_PM, unless that has changed.
>
> Seems like you've only compile tested this patch, is that correct ?
Yes, I compile-tested only and inspected the code briefly without finding
anything that contradicted this. It seems I missed the important part
as you say, so we should instead add 'depends on PM' for the other
symbols.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-17 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-17 21:01 [PATCH] USB: USB_OTG does not depend on PM Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-17 21:38 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-17 22:00 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-17 22:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-18 3:17 ` Peter Chen
2015-11-18 9:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-18 9:41 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5647698.81XCu85L5D@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Peter.Chen@freescale.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox