From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752837AbbKPQcW (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:32:22 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37928 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751942AbbKPQcV (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:32:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc: gpio: Fix typos in Documentation/gpio To: Masanari Iida , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org References: <1447671635-28855-1-git-send-email-standby24x7@gmail.com> From: Randy Dunlap X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <564A0513.4090906@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:32:19 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1447671635-28855-1-git-send-email-standby24x7@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/16/15 03:00, Masanari Iida wrote: > This patch fix some spelling typos found in Documentation/gpio. > > Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida > --- > Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt | 4 ++-- > Documentation/gpio/driver.txt | 6 +++--- > Documentation/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.txt | 6 +++--- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > diff --git a/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt b/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt > index 12a6194..bbeec41 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt > +++ b/Documentation/gpio/driver.txt > @@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of two categories: > it will be threaded IRQ handler on -RT and hard IRQ handler on non-RT > (for example, see [3]). > Know W/A: The generic_handle_irq() is expected to be called with IRQ disabled, Known and I really would like to see all "W/A" changed to "workaround". W/A is not a well known abbreviation. As for the patch changes: Acked-by: Randy Dunlap Thanks. > - so IRQ core will complain if it will be called from IRQ handler wich is forced > - thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to W/A this problem: > + so IRQ core will complain if it will be called from IRQ handler which is > + forced thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to W/A this problem: > > raw_spinlock_t wa_lock; > static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank) -- ~Randy