From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
roger.pau@citrix.com, felipe.franciosi@citrix.com, axboe@fb.com,
avanzini.arianna@gmail.com, rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com,
jonathan.davies@citrix.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] xen/blkfront: negotiate number of queues/rings to be used with backend
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:13:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564A631E.7040905@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151116212702.GA12823@char.us.oracle.com>
On 11/17/2015 05:27 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> /* Common code used when first setting up, and when resuming. */
>> static int talk_to_blkback(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>> @@ -1527,10 +1582,9 @@ static int talk_to_blkback(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>> {
>> const char *message = NULL;
>> struct xenbus_transaction xbt;
>> - int err, i;
>> - unsigned int max_page_order = 0;
>> + int err;
>> + unsigned int i, max_page_order = 0;
>> unsigned int ring_page_order = 0;
>> - struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo;
>
> Why? You end up doing the 'struct blkfront_ring_info' decleration
> in two of the loops below?
Oh, that's because Roger mentioned we would be tempted to declare rinfo only inside the for loop, to limit
the scope.
>>
>> err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
>> "max-ring-page-order", "%u", &max_page_order);
>> @@ -1542,7 +1596,8 @@ static int talk_to_blkback(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++) {
>> - rinfo = &info->rinfo[i];
>> + struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = &info->rinfo[i];
>> +
>
> Here..
>
>> @@ -1617,7 +1677,7 @@ again:
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < info->nr_rings; i++) {
>> int j;
>> - rinfo = &info->rinfo[i];
>> + struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo = &info->rinfo[i];
>
> And here?
>
> It is not a big deal but I am curious of why add this change?
>
>> @@ -1717,7 +1789,6 @@ static int blkfront_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev,
>>
>> mutex_init(&info->mutex);
>> spin_lock_init(&info->dev_lock);
>> - info->xbdev = dev;
>
> That looks like a spurious change? Ah, I see that we do the same exact
> operation earlier in the blkfront_probe.
>
The place of this line was changed because:
1738 info->xbdev = dev;
1739 /* Check if backend supports multiple queues. */
1740 err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
^^^^
We need xbdev to be set in advance.
1741 "multi-queue-max-queues", "%u", &backend_max_queues);
1742 if (err < 0)
1743 backend_max_queues = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-16 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-14 3:12 [PATCH v5 00/10] xen-block: multi hardware-queues/rings support Bob Liu
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] xen/blkif: document blkif multi-queue/ring extension Bob Liu
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] xen/blkfront: separate per ring information out of device info Bob Liu
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] xen/blkfront: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] xen/blkfront: split per device io_lock Bob Liu
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] xen/blkfront: negotiate number of queues/rings to be used with backend Bob Liu
[not found] ` <20151116212702.GA12823@char.us.oracle.com>
2015-11-16 23:13 ` Bob Liu [this message]
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] xen/blkback: separate ring information out of struct xen_blkif Bob Liu
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] xen/blkback: pseudo support for multi hardware queues/rings Bob Liu
2015-11-25 17:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] xen/blkback: get the number of hardware queues/rings from blkfront Bob Liu
2015-11-25 17:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] xen/blkfront: make persistent grants pool per-queue Bob Liu
2015-11-14 3:12 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] xen/blkback: make pool of persistent grants and free pages per-queue Bob Liu
2015-11-25 19:25 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] xen-block: multi hardware-queues/rings support Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-25 20:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-25 22:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-26 2:28 ` Bob Liu
2015-11-26 2:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-26 7:09 ` Bob Liu
2015-11-26 16:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-25 19:35 ` [PATCH RFC] Various fixes to xen block drivers on top of Bob's multi-queue patches Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-25 19:35 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] xen/blocks: Return -EXX instead of -1 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-25 19:35 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] xen/blkback: Free resources if connect_ring failed Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564A631E.7040905@oracle.com \
--to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=felipe.franciosi@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafal.mielniczuk@citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox