From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, <ast@kernel.org>,
<lizefan@huawei.com>, <pi3orama@163.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] bpf tools: Collect map definition in bpf_object
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:21:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5657F669.5070404@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5657F544.1080708@huawei.com>
On 2015/11/27 14:16, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/11/27 4:56, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:36:09PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
>
> [SNIP]
[SNIP]
>>> +
>>> + if ((prev < s) || (prev >= e)) {
>>> + pr_warning("error: map handler doesn't belong to object\n");
>> I wonder if this shouldn't be made pr_debug, and as well have a function
>> prefix, otherwise we may think this is related to some other kind of
>> map, so I suggest:
>> pr_debug("%s: error: map handler doesn't belong to object\n",
>> __func__);
>>
>> Or at least:
>>
>> pr_debug("BPF error: map handler doesn't belong to object\n");
>
> We always have a libbpf prefix before debug info from libbpf. Please see
>
> static __printf(1, 2) libbpf_print_fn_t __pr_warning = __base_pr;
> static __printf(1, 2) libbpf_print_fn_t __pr_info = __base_pr;
> static __printf(1, 2) libbpf_print_fn_t __pr_debug;
> #define __pr(func, fmt, ...) \
> do { \
> if ((func)) \
> (func)("libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define pr_warning(fmt, ...) __pr(__pr_warning, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #define pr_info(fmt, ...) __pr(__pr_info, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) __pr(__pr_debug, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> We allow __pr_{warning,info,debug} be overwritten but the 'libbpf:'
> prefix is
> always there.
>
> Also, don't forget in perf's context libbpf is muted.
>
Sorry, Shoule be "muted in most case"...
Here's an example:
$ sudo ./perf record -v -e ./test_bpf_base.c ls
...
ude/uapi -Iinclude/generated/uapi -include
/home/w00229757/linux-hydrogen/include/linux/kconfig.h
set env: WORKING_DIR=/lib/modules/4.3.0-rc4+/build
set env: CLANG_SOURCE=/home/w00229757/./test_bpf_base.c
llvm compiling command template: $CLANG_EXEC -D__KERNEL__
-D__NR_CPUS__=$NR_CPUS -DLINUX_VERSION_CODE=$LINUX_VERSION_CODE
$CLANG_OPTIONS $KERNEL_INC_OPTIONS -Wno-unused-value -Wno-pointer-sign
-working-directory $WORKING_DIR -c "$CLANG_SOURCE" -target bpf -O2 -o -
libbpf: loading object './test_bpf_base.c' from buffer
libbpf: section .strtab, size 112, link 0, flags 0, type=3
libbpf: section .text, size 0, link 0, flags 6, type=1
libbpf: section .data, size 0, link 0, flags 3, type=1
...
libbpf: kernel version of ./test_bpf_base.c is 40300
libbpf: section .symtab, size 96, link 1, flags 0, type=2
bpf: config program 'func_write=vfs_write file->f_mode'
symbol:vfs_write file:(null) line:0 offset:0 return:0 lazy:(null)
parsing arg: file->f_mode into file, f_mode(1)
bpf: config 'func_write=vfs_write file->f_mode' is ok
If the error you pointed out is triggered, it should be:
libbpf: error: map handler doesn't belong to object ...
So we can always find which error message is belone to libbpf
and which is belone to perf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-27 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-24 13:36 [PATCH 00/16] perf tools: BPF related update Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 01/16] tools build: Clean CFLAGS and LDFLAGS for fixdep Wang Nan
2015-11-26 8:21 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 02/16] tools lib bpf: Don't feature check when cleaning Wang Nan
2015-11-26 8:22 ` [tip:perf/core] tools lib bpf: Don' t do a " tip-bot for Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 03/16] bpf tools: Add helper function for updating bpf maps elements Wang Nan
2015-11-27 7:47 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for He Kuang
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 04/16] bpf tools: Collect map definition in bpf_object Wang Nan
2015-11-26 20:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-27 6:16 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-27 6:21 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 05/16] bpf tools: Extract and collect map names from BPF object file Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 06/16] perf tools: Rename bpf config to program config Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 07/16] perf tools: Add API to config maps in bpf object Wang Nan
2015-11-27 7:32 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 08/16] perf tools: Enable BPF object configure syntax Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 09/16] perf record: Apply config to BPF objects before recording Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 10/16] perf tools: Support perf event alias name Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 11/16] perf tools: Enable passing event to BPF object Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 12/16] perf tools: Support setting different slots in a BPF map separately Wang Nan
2015-11-27 7:31 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 13/16] perf tools: Enable indices setting syntax for BPF maps Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 14/16] perf tools: Introduce bpf-output event Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 15/16] perf data: Add u32_hex data type Wang Nan
2015-11-24 13:36 ` [PATCH 16/16] perf data: Support converting data from bpf_perf_event_output() Wang Nan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5657F669.5070404@huawei.com \
--to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox