From: Stefan Wahren <info@lategoodbye.de>
To: Remi Pommarel <repk@triplefau.lt>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Tanghe <bart.tanghe@thomasmore.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add PWM clock support for bcm2835
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:22:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565B6CA0.2070702@lategoodbye.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151129003121.GH491@cruxbox>
Hi Remi,
Am 29.11.2015 um 01:31 schrieb Remi Pommarel:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:52:07PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> i applied the series including the devicetree modification, but it
>> doesn't work for me.
>>
>> First of all i get an ugly division by zero warning from the pwm
>> driver. The pwm driver still assume a fixed clock and doesn't handle
>> the error cases of clk_get_rate(). I attached a patch at the end.
>
> Yes the devicetree patch from patchset version one does not work with
> this version.
thanks. I successfully tested the pwm with the led pwm driver.
> I haven't sent the modified devicetree because Eric said
> it is better to send it in a separate patchset. If you want to test it I
> attached the working devicetree patch at the end.
I don't think that he said that. He wanted you to send the devicetree
changes as a separate patch. So it should be okay if it's part of the
same patchset.
>
> But, yes, that would be nice if pwm driver was protected from this
> division by zero.
I will create a proper patch.
>
>>
>> The reason in my case why clk_get_rate() returns zero is that the
>> pwm clock is orphan ( pwm is listed under
>> /sys/kernel/debug/clk_orphan_summary ).
>>
>> My suspicion is it has something to do with the clock manager driver.
>> The bcm2835_clock_per_parents contains only 8 entries. But according to
>> BCM2835-ARM-Peripherals.pdf [1] CM_GP0CTL SRC page 107 has 16
>> entries. The upper 8 entries are all mapped to GND. It looks to me
>> that the driver doesn't take care of this and so the pwm clock isn't
>> able to determine it's parent.
>>
>
> In fact, default parent for pwm after boot up is GND (CM_GP0CTL SRC ==
> 0). Which means that the default pwm clock rate is 0. The clock appears
> to be orphan because in the bcm2835 clock driver, the GND clock is not
> registered.
Thanks for the explanation.
Best regards
Stefan
>
> So, IMHO, we have to set the default pwm rate from the devicetree, using
> assigned-clock-rates. That what does the following dts patch.
>
> This patch also set the gpio pin 18 to proper alternate function in order
> to be able to get pwm output from this gpio.
>
> Thanks
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-29 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-11 14:22 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add PWM clock support for bcm2835 Remi Pommarel
2015-11-11 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: bcm2835: Always round up clock divisor Remi Pommarel
2015-11-18 18:25 ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-18 19:11 ` Remi Pommarel
2015-12-02 22:21 ` Remi Pommarel
2015-12-04 0:31 ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-11 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: bcm2835: Support for clock parent selection Remi Pommarel
2015-11-18 18:30 ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-18 19:24 ` Remi Pommarel
2015-12-04 0:37 ` Eric Anholt
2015-12-04 20:37 ` Remi Pommarel
2015-12-06 0:19 ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-11 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] clk: bcm2835: Add PWM clock support Remi Pommarel
2015-11-18 18:32 ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-18 19:26 ` Remi Pommarel
2015-11-28 20:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Add PWM clock support for bcm2835 Stefan Wahren
2015-11-29 0:31 ` Remi Pommarel
2015-11-29 21:22 ` Stefan Wahren [this message]
2015-11-29 22:25 ` Remi Pommarel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565B6CA0.2070702@lategoodbye.de \
--to=info@lategoodbye.de \
--cc=bart.tanghe@thomasmore.be \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=repk@triplefau.lt \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox