From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
<linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip v5 2/5] kbuild: Add option to turn incompatible pointer check into error
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:26:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565C6A8B.8080103@bmw-carit.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448890711-5812-3-git-send-email-daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
On 11/30/2015 02:38 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> With the introduction of the simple wait API we have two very
> similar APIs in the kernel. For example wake_up() and swake_up()
> is only one character away. Although the compiler will warn
> happily the wrong usage it keeps on going an even links the kernel.
> Thomas and Peter would rather like to see early missuses reported
> as error early on.
>
> In a first attempt we tried to wrap all swait and wait calls
> into a macro which has an compile time type assertion. The result
> was pretty ugly and wasn't able to catch all wrong usages.
> woken_wake_function(), autoremove_wake_function() and wake_bit_function()
> are assigned as function pointers. Wrapping them with a macro around is
> not possible. Prefixing them with '_' was also not a real option
> because there some users in the kernel which do use them as well.
> All in all this attempt looked to intrusive and too ugly.
>
> An alternative is to turn the pointer type check into an error which
> catches wrong type uses. Obviously not only the swait/wait ones. That
> isn't a bad thing either. Though for the beginning let's introduce it
> as options in the kernel hacking section.
The kbuild bot found one problem for allmodconfig. I just send a fix for
it ("regmap: Fix leftover from struct reg_default to struct reg_sequence
change").
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-30 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 13:38 [PATCH tip v5 0/5] Simple wait queue support Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 1/5] wait.[ch]: Introduce the simple waitqueue (swait) implementation Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 2/5] kbuild: Add option to turn incompatible pointer check into error Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 15:26 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2015-11-30 17:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-11-30 18:52 ` Daniel Wagner
2016-01-27 12:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 3/5] KVM: use simple waitqueue for vcpu->wq Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 4/5] rcu: Do not call rcu_nocb_gp_cleanup() while holding rnp->lock Daniel Wagner
2015-11-30 13:38 ` [PATCH tip v5 5/5] rcu: use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree Daniel Wagner
2016-01-27 12:08 ` [PATCH tip v5 0/5] Simple wait queue support Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565C6A8B.8080103@bmw-carit.de \
--to=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox