* Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm3168a: Add driver for pcm3168a codec [not found] <1448376224-23964-3-git-send-email-Damien.Horsley@imgtec.com> @ 2015-11-27 12:54 ` Mark Brown 2015-11-30 16:49 ` Damien Horsley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2015-11-27 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Damien Horsley Cc: alsa-devel, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Liam Girdwood, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Charles Keepax, Vinod Koul, Thomas Niederprum, Bard Liao, Richard Fitzgerald, Jyri Sarha, Maciej S. Szmigiero, Arnd Bergmann, devicetree, linux-kernel, James Hartley [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3571 bytes --] On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:43:44PM +0000, Damien Horsley wrote: > From: "Damien.Horsley" <Damien.Horsley@imgtec.com> > > Add driver for Texas Instruments pcm3168a codec Please try to keep your CC lists reasonable - only CC people who have an interest in the patch you're posting. The CC list you have here is far too broad, I can't figure out why a lot of the people there ended up there. If you've got 10 people that's generally a warning sign. Overall this looks good but there are a few smallish issues below: > + if ((!slave_mode || (fmt & PCM3168A_FMT_DSP_MASK)) && > + (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S24_3LE)) { > + dev_err(codec->dev, "48-bit frames not supported in master mode or slave mode using DSP(A/B)\n"); You've got a lot of weird indentation with the second line of multi-line if conditionals massively further indented than I'd expect. These conditionals all also seem more complex than they should be - the fact that you're using so many !slave_modes makes me think that you should have a flag for master mode and... > + if ((!slave_mode || ((fmt != PCM3168A_FMT_RIGHT_J) && > + (fmt != PCM3168A_FMT_LEFT_J))) && > + (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16)) { ...especially with things like this the indentation makes it hard to tell what bits go together. > + val = slave_mode ? 0 : ((i + 1) << shift); Please write normal if statements unless there's a strong reason to use the ternery operator. > + /* > + * Justification has no effect for S32 and S16 as the whole frame > + * is filled with the samples, but the register field > + * must be set to a specific value for correct operation > + */ > + if ((fmt == PCM3168A_FMT_RIGHT_J) && > + (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S32)) { > + fmt = PCM3168A_FMT_LEFT_J; > + } else if (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16) { > + fmt = PCM3168A_FMT_RIGHT_J_16; > + } Being in right justified mode *does* have an effect - it changes where the audio data starts relative to LRCLK. It is true that if the frame has exactly the right number of clocks left and right justified are identical but extra clocks are in general permitted so it looks like your right justified case above just isn't something the device really supports. > + pcm3168a->scki = devm_clk_get(dev, "scki"); > + if (IS_ERR(pcm3168a->scki)) { > + if (PTR_ERR(pcm3168a->scki) != -EPROBE_DEFER) > + dev_err(dev, "failed to acquire clock 'scki'\n"); Please print the error code as well, it may help people understand the problem. > + ret = snd_soc_register_codec(dev, &pcm3168a_driver, pcm3168a_dais, > + ARRAY_SIZE(pcm3168a_dais)); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to register codec: %d\n", ret); > + goto err_regulator; > + } > + > + pm_runtime_set_active(dev); > + pm_runtime_enable(dev); > + pm_runtime_idle(dev); You should enable runtime PM before registering the CODEC since the core can do runtime PM operations and if it tries before runtime PM is enabled things will get unbalanced. > +#define PCM3168A_DOUBLE_STS(xname, reg, shift_left, shift_right, max, invert) \ > +{ \ > + .iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = (xname), \ > + .info = snd_soc_info_volsw, .get = snd_soc_get_volsw, \ > + .put = snd_soc_put_volsw, \ > + .access = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_READ | \ > + SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_VOLATILE, \ > + .private_value = SOC_DOUBLE_VALUE(reg, shift_left, shift_right, \ > + max, invert, 0) \ > +} This doesn't look like it should be driver specific - what's driver specific about it? [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm3168a: Add driver for pcm3168a codec 2015-11-27 12:54 ` [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm3168a: Add driver for pcm3168a codec Mark Brown @ 2015-11-30 16:49 ` Damien Horsley 2015-12-01 17:59 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Damien Horsley @ 2015-11-30 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Liam Girdwood, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Jyri Sarha, devicetree, linux-kernel, James Hartley On 27/11/15 12:54, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:43:44PM +0000, Damien Horsley wrote: >> From: "Damien.Horsley" <Damien.Horsley@imgtec.com> >> >> Add driver for Texas Instruments pcm3168a codec > > Please try to keep your CC lists reasonable - only CC people who have an > interest in the patch you're posting. The CC list you have here is far > too broad, I can't figure out why a lot of the people there ended up > there. If you've got 10 people that's generally a warning sign. > The list was generated by scripts/get_maintainer.pl when used on the patches. I will remove some that look like they don't need to be there. > Overall this looks good but there are a few smallish issues below: > >> + if ((!slave_mode || (fmt & PCM3168A_FMT_DSP_MASK)) && >> + (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S24_3LE)) { >> + dev_err(codec->dev, "48-bit frames not supported in master mode or slave mode using DSP(A/B)\n"); > > You've got a lot of weird indentation with the second line of multi-line > if conditionals massively further indented than I'd expect. These > conditionals all also seem more complex than they should be - the fact > that you're using so many !slave_modes makes me think that you should > have a flag for master mode and... > >> + if ((!slave_mode || ((fmt != PCM3168A_FMT_RIGHT_J) && >> + (fmt != PCM3168A_FMT_LEFT_J))) && >> + (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16)) { > > ...especially with things like this the indentation makes it hard to > tell what bits go together. > Ok >> + val = slave_mode ? 0 : ((i + 1) << shift); > > Please write normal if statements unless there's a strong reason to use > the ternery operator. > Ok >> + /* >> + * Justification has no effect for S32 and S16 as the whole frame >> + * is filled with the samples, but the register field >> + * must be set to a specific value for correct operation >> + */ >> + if ((fmt == PCM3168A_FMT_RIGHT_J) && >> + (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S32)) { >> + fmt = PCM3168A_FMT_LEFT_J; >> + } else if (format == SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16) { >> + fmt = PCM3168A_FMT_RIGHT_J_16; >> + } > > Being in right justified mode *does* have an effect - it changes where > the audio data starts relative to LRCLK. It is true that if the frame > has exactly the right number of clocks left and right justified are > identical but extra clocks are in general permitted so it looks like > your right justified case above just isn't something the device really > supports. > Should the value returned by snd_soc_params_to_frame_size be treated as the minimum frame size? >> + pcm3168a->scki = devm_clk_get(dev, "scki"); >> + if (IS_ERR(pcm3168a->scki)) { >> + if (PTR_ERR(pcm3168a->scki) != -EPROBE_DEFER) >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to acquire clock 'scki'\n"); > > Please print the error code as well, it may help people understand the > problem. > Ok >> + ret = snd_soc_register_codec(dev, &pcm3168a_driver, pcm3168a_dais, >> + ARRAY_SIZE(pcm3168a_dais)); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register codec: %d\n", ret); >> + goto err_regulator; >> + } >> + >> + pm_runtime_set_active(dev); >> + pm_runtime_enable(dev); >> + pm_runtime_idle(dev); > > You should enable runtime PM before registering the CODEC since the core > can do runtime PM operations and if it tries before runtime PM is > enabled things will get unbalanced. > Ok >> +#define PCM3168A_DOUBLE_STS(xname, reg, shift_left, shift_right, max, invert) \ >> +{ \ >> + .iface = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_IFACE_MIXER, .name = (xname), \ >> + .info = snd_soc_info_volsw, .get = snd_soc_get_volsw, \ >> + .put = snd_soc_put_volsw, \ >> + .access = SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_READ | \ >> + SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_VOLATILE, \ >> + .private_value = SOC_DOUBLE_VALUE(reg, shift_left, shift_right, \ >> + max, invert, 0) \ >> +} > > This doesn't look like it should be driver specific - what's driver > specific about it? > There is nothing driver specific. I will add this to include/sound/soc.h as SOC_DOUBLE_STS ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm3168a: Add driver for pcm3168a codec 2015-11-30 16:49 ` Damien Horsley @ 2015-12-01 17:59 ` Mark Brown 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mark Brown @ 2015-12-01 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Damien Horsley Cc: alsa-devel, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Liam Girdwood, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Jyri Sarha, devicetree, linux-kernel, James Hartley [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1358 bytes --] On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:49:30PM +0000, Damien Horsley wrote: > On 27/11/15 12:54, Mark Brown wrote: > > Please try to keep your CC lists reasonable - only CC people who have an > > interest in the patch you're posting. The CC list you have here is far > > too broad, I can't figure out why a lot of the people there ended up > > there. If you've got 10 people that's generally a warning sign. > The list was generated by scripts/get_maintainer.pl when used on the > patches. I will remove some that look like they don't need to be there. You should not be using get_maintainer unfiltered, you need to think about why everyone is there. People often end up getting included due to just random cleanups and getting lots of mail about drivers they have no lasting interest in may be demotivating. > > Being in right justified mode *does* have an effect - it changes where > > the audio data starts relative to LRCLK. It is true that if the frame > > has exactly the right number of clocks left and right justified are > > identical but extra clocks are in general permitted so it looks like > > your right justified case above just isn't something the device really > > supports. > Should the value returned by snd_soc_params_to_frame_size be treated as > the minimum frame size? Yes, in general most hardware is perfectly happy with extra clocks. [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-01 18:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1448376224-23964-3-git-send-email-Damien.Horsley@imgtec.com>
2015-11-27 12:54 ` [alsa-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: pcm3168a: Add driver for pcm3168a codec Mark Brown
2015-11-30 16:49 ` Damien Horsley
2015-12-01 17:59 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox