The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] linux 4.4 Regression: 100% cpu usage on idle pv guest under Xen with single vcpu.
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:54:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <565CD3A7.1060006@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16a638d3c5e24963599e621f265181f8@eikelenboom.it>

On 11/30/2015 04:46 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 2015-11-30 22:45, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have just tested a 4.4-rc2 kernel (current linus tree) + the tip tree
>>> pulled on top.
>>>
>>> Running this kernel under Xen on PV-guests with multiple vcpus goes 
>>> well (on
>>> idle < 10% cpu usage),
>>> but a guest with only a single vcpu doesn't idle at all, it seems a 
>>> kworker
>>> thread is stuck:
>>> root       569 98.0  0.0      0     0 ?        R    16:02 12:47
>>> [kworker/0:1]
>>>
>>> Running a 4.3 kernel works fine with a single vpcu, bisecting would 
>>> probably
>>> quite painful since there were some breakages this merge window with 
>>> respect
>>> to Xen pv-guests.
>>>
>>> There are some differences in the diff's from booting a 4.3, 
>>> 4.4-single,
>>> 4.4-multi cpu boot:
>>
>> Boris has been tracking a bunch of them. I am attaching the latest 
>> set of
>> patches I've to carry on top of v4.4-rc3.
>
> Hi Konrad,
>
> i will test those, see if it fixes all my issues and report back

They shouldn't help you ;-( (and I just saw a message from you 
confirming this)

The first one fixes a 32-bit bug (on bare metal too). The second fixes a 
fatal bug for 32-bit PV guests. The other two are code improvements/cleanup.


>
> Thanks :)
>
> -- 
> Sander
>
>>> Between 4.3 and 4.4-single:
>>>
>>> -NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:32 16
>>> +Using NULL legacy PIC
>>> +NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:32 0

This is fine, as long as you have b4ff8389ed14b849354b59ce9b360bdefcdbf99c.

>>>
>>> -cpu 0 spinlock event irq 17
>>> +cpu 0 spinlock event irq 1

This is strange. I wouldn't expect spinlocks to use legacy irqs.

>>>
>>> and later on:
>>>
>>> -hctosys: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
>>> +rtc_cmos rtc_cmos: hctosys: unable to read the hardware clock
>>>
>>> +genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 00000000 (hvc_console) vs. 00000000 
>>> (rtc0)
>>> +hvc_open: request_irq failed with rc -16.
>>> +Warning: unable to open an initial console.
>>>
>>>
>>> between 4.4-single and 4.4-multi:
>>>
>>>  Using NULL legacy PIC
>>> -NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:32 0
>>> +NR_IRQS:4352 nr_irqs:48 0

This is probably OK too since nr_irqs depend on number of CPUs.

I think something is messed up with IRQ. I saw last week something from 
setup_irq() generating a stack dump (warninig) for rtc_cmos but it 
appeared harmless at that time and now I don't see it anymore.

-boris


>>>
>>> and later on:
>>>
>>> -rtc_cmos rtc_cmos: hctosys: unable to read the hardware clock
>>> +hctosys: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
>>>
>>> -genirq: Flags mismatch irq 8. 00000000 (hvc_console) vs. 00000000 
>>> (rtc0)
>>> -hvc_open: request_irq failed with rc -16.
>>> -Warning: unable to open an initial console.
>>>
>>> attached:
>>>     - dmesg with 4.3 kernel with 1 vcpu
>>>     - dmesg with 4.4 kernel with 1 vpcu
>>>     - dmesg with 4.4 kernel with 2 vpcus
>>>     - .config of the 4.4 kernel is attached.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Sander
>>>
>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-30 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-28 15:47 linux 4.4 Regression: 100% cpu usage on idle pv guest under Xen with single vcpu Sander Eikelenboom
     [not found] ` <20151130214513.GF14317@char.us.oracle.com>
2015-11-30 21:46   ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-11-30 22:54     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2015-11-30 22:55       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 22:47         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:00           ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:19             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:30               ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:41                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:44                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 10:04                   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 22:51       ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:05         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-30 22:47   ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 14:15 ` David Vrabel
2015-12-02 14:55 ` David Vrabel
2015-12-02 17:30   ` Sander Eikelenboom
     [not found] <CAPQw5rmKWRoYQa4Lt9ZyBzKuK3kKSXkd_YoYWO_cVfKoL+EMbw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-14 21:07 ` Sander Eikelenboom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=565CD3A7.1060006@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox