From: Michael Wang <yun.wang@profitbricks.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] iommu/amd: gray the 'irq_remap_table' object for kmemleak
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:07:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565EED28.7050308@profitbricks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202125636.GE18805@8bytes.org>
On 12/02/2015 01:56 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:31:38PM +0100, Michael Wang wrote:
>> It's not my work or your work... it's a defect in the module and maintainer
>> should take responsibility on fixing it, correct?
>
> No, its a false positive from an in-kernel checking tool, the iommu
> driver is correct. You just sent a patch to silence the false positive
> report.
Yeah, but caused by the driver :-P and have to be fixed in there too.
>
>> We're very willing to help, but as I mentioned we are out of resource for
>> testing at this moment, but we can send you a new patch without testing,
>> will that works for you?
>
> This should be testable on any AMD IOMMU system with working interrupt
> remapping. I will probably have no time to test this, if you really
> can't test yourself, try to get a Tested-by from someone else.
Good point, anyone willing to help test the fix? Or better provide the new
patch to be the author.
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>
>
> Joerg
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 11:09 [RFC PATCH] iommu/amd: make kmemleak ignore the 'irq_remap_table' object Michael Wang
2015-11-20 11:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2] iommu/amd: gray the 'irq_remap_table' object for kmemleak Michael Wang
2015-11-20 12:31 ` Michael Wang
2015-11-25 11:14 ` Michael Wang
2015-11-25 15:08 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-11-25 15:14 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 10:37 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 10:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-02 10:56 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 11:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-02 11:38 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 11:51 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-12-02 12:31 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 12:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-02 13:01 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 13:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-02 13:18 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-02 13:48 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 13:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-02 14:09 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 14:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-02 14:21 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 17:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-12-02 18:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-03 8:47 ` Michael Wang
2015-12-02 12:56 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-12-02 13:07 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2015-12-02 11:17 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565EED28.7050308@profitbricks.com \
--to=yun.wang@profitbricks.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox