From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755324AbbLDHeV (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 02:34:21 -0500 Received: from dehamd003.servertools24.de ([31.47.254.18]:37964 "EHLO dehamd003.servertools24.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752020AbbLDHeT (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Dec 2015 02:34:19 -0500 Subject: Re: A new, fast and "unbreakable" encryption algorithm To: Ismail Kizir References: <564CA86C.1000402@skogtun.org> <564D90CF.4080100@ladisch.de> <20151203223518.GF14427@amd> Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Clemens Ladisch Message-ID: <566141F5.2080504@ladisch.de> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:34:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PPP-Message-ID: <20151204073414.622686.75047@dehamd003.servertools24.de> X-PPP-Vhost: ladisch.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ismail Kizir wrote: > What means "did not look random"? A plaintext consisting of repeated bytes (zero, or other values) eventually makes your algorithm go into a loop, which results in repeated bytes. > On the pictures, there is also an example of "full 0"(it appears red, > but it is full 0 bmp) example. > And it "looks" perfectly random. No, red is _not_ perfectly random. When I see a red picture, I have evidence that the plaintext was zeroes. Regards, Clemens