linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
	"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"nico@linaro.org" <nico@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:41:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5666D00E.1000301@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151208104418.GB8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On 08/12/15 10:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:22:53AM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 15/10/15 10:30, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>>> __user_swpX_asm maybe failed in first STREX operation, emulate_swpX
>>> will try again, but the *data has been changed in first time. which
>>> causes the result is wrong.
>>> This patch is to fix this issue. When STREX succeed, change the *data.
>>> if it fail, *data is not changed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 6 +++---
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
>>> index 5b26e7e..c3fe769d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
>>> @@ -36,10 +36,10 @@
>>>   */
>>>  #define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, B)		\
>>>  	__asm__ __volatile__(					\
>>> -	"	mov		%2, %1\n"			\
>>> -	"0:	ldrex"B"	%1, [%3]\n"			\
>>> -	"1:	strex"B"	%0, %2, [%3]\n"			\
>>> +	"0:	ldrex"B"	%2, [%3]\n"			\
>>> +	"1:	strex"B"	%0, %1, [%3]\n"			\
>>>  	"	cmp		%0, #0\n"			\
>>> +	"	moveq		%1, %2\n"			\
>>>  	"	movne		%0, %4\n"			\
>>>  	"2:\n"							\
>>>  	"	.section	 .text.fixup,\"ax\"\n"		\
>>>
>>
>> I wonder what is status of this patch? I see that arm64 counterpart has
>> landed in mainline, but I didn't manage to track down this one - is it
>> because it never been submitted to patch system?
> 
> Most probably.
> 

I've just submitted (on behalf of Shengjiu) it as 8475/1 with assumption
you have no concerns about the patch.

Thanks
Vladimir


      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-08 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-15  9:30 [PATCH V2] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed Shengjiu Wang
2015-12-08 10:22 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-12-08 10:44   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-08 12:41     ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5666D00E.1000301@arm.com \
    --to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).