From: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
"ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"nico@linaro.org" <nico@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:41:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5666D00E.1000301@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151208104418.GB8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 08/12/15 10:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:22:53AM +0000, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
>> On 15/10/15 10:30, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>>> __user_swpX_asm maybe failed in first STREX operation, emulate_swpX
>>> will try again, but the *data has been changed in first time. which
>>> causes the result is wrong.
>>> This patch is to fix this issue. When STREX succeed, change the *data.
>>> if it fail, *data is not changed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
>>> index 5b26e7e..c3fe769d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
>>> @@ -36,10 +36,10 @@
>>> */
>>> #define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, B) \
>>> __asm__ __volatile__( \
>>> - " mov %2, %1\n" \
>>> - "0: ldrex"B" %1, [%3]\n" \
>>> - "1: strex"B" %0, %2, [%3]\n" \
>>> + "0: ldrex"B" %2, [%3]\n" \
>>> + "1: strex"B" %0, %1, [%3]\n" \
>>> " cmp %0, #0\n" \
>>> + " moveq %1, %2\n" \
>>> " movne %0, %4\n" \
>>> "2:\n" \
>>> " .section .text.fixup,\"ax\"\n" \
>>>
>>
>> I wonder what is status of this patch? I see that arm64 counterpart has
>> landed in mainline, but I didn't manage to track down this one - is it
>> because it never been submitted to patch system?
>
> Most probably.
>
I've just submitted (on behalf of Shengjiu) it as 8475/1 with assumption
you have no concerns about the patch.
Thanks
Vladimir
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-15 9:30 [PATCH V2] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed Shengjiu Wang
2015-12-08 10:22 ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-12-08 10:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-08 12:41 ` Vladimir Murzin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5666D00E.1000301@arm.com \
--to=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).