From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932857AbbLHMwd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:52:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:35087 "EHLO mail-wm0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932537AbbLHMwb (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:52:31 -0500 Message-ID: <5666D28C.4090305@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 20:52:28 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , fu.wei@linaro.org CC: tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org, tn@semihalf.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, Marc.Zyngier@arm.com, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, harba@qti.qualcomm.com, jcm@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, rrichter@cavium.com, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, jon.zhixiong.zhang@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64. References: <1449558183-12259-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <20151208123433.GB404@red-moon> In-Reply-To: <20151208123433.GB404@red-moon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Lorenzo, On 12/08/2015 08:34 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:03:03PM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote: >> From: Tomasz Nowicki > > [...] > >> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) >> /* >> * Check if firmware advertises firmware first mode. We need FF bit to be set >> * along with a set of MC banks which work in FF mode. >> */ >> static int __init hest_parse_cmc(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data) >> { >> - return arch_apei_enable_cmcff(hest_hdr, data); >> + if (!acpi_disable_cmcff) > > Why do not you define the flag above in this file (move it out of x86 - > that's what I was aiming at in my previous reply) and remove this ifdeffery > altogether (First firmware handling could apply to arm64 too according to > specs and ACPI on arm64 guidelines) ? If I understand it correctly, CMC (Corrected Machine Check) is for IA32 only, see section 18.3.2.1 IA-32 Architecture Machine Check Exception in ACPI 6.0. for ARM64, we can use other type of error source for firmware first handling, such as Generic Hardware Error Source, did I miss something? Thanks Hanjun