public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <broonie@kernel.org>, <stefan@agner.ch>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:14:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56693B5B.6060100@toradex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2295258.Vc5Dp4nsCT@ws-stein>

On 12/10/2015 12:45 PM, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Thursday 10 December 2015 11:25:30, Bhuvanchandra DV wrote:
>> DSPI instances in Vybrid have a different amount of chip selects
>> and CTARs (Clock and transfer Attributes Register). In case of
>> DSPI1 we only have 2 CTAR registers and 4 CS. In present driver
>> implementation CTAR offset is derived from CS instance which will
>> lead to out of bound access if chip select instance is greater than
>> CTAR register instance, hence use single CTAR0 register for all CS
>> instances. Since we write the CTAR register anyway before each access,
>> there is no value in using the additional CTAR registers. Also one
>> should not program a value in CTAS for a CTAR register that is not
>> present, hence configure CTAS to use CTAR0.
>
> Shouldn't the information put into struct fsl_dspi_devtype_data how much CTAR and CS the actual implementation has available? E.g. LS1021A has 6 CS and 4 CTAR

I guess still this will not help us when CS instance greater than CTAR 
instance is selected. Other point to consider here is we are writing the 
CTAR register before every access, so for us there is no additional 
advantage of using multiple CTAR registers.

>
> Best regards,
> Alexander
>

-- 
Best regards,
Bhuvan

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-10  5:55 [PATCH v2] spi-fsl-dspi: Fix CTAR Register access Bhuvanchandra DV
2015-12-10  7:15 ` Alexander Stein
2015-12-10  8:44   ` Bhuvanchandra DV [this message]
2015-12-10  9:06     ` Alexander Stein
2015-12-10 16:38       ` Stefan Agner
2015-12-10 16:47 ` Stefan Agner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56693B5B.6060100@toradex.com \
    --to=bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com \
    --cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox