From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753418AbbLJLEL (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:04:11 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47038 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751699AbbLJLEJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: <56695C28.1060307@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:04:08 -0500 From: Prarit Bhargava User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jacob Pan CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Radivoje Jovanovic , Seiichi Ikarashi , Mathias Krause , Ajay Thomas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powercap, intel_rapl.c, fix BIOS lock check References: <1449667872-11197-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <5563622.j8xTDST9Ds@vostro.rjw.lan> <20151209153123.60220026@icelake> <1869286.F6FKdkBDy4@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <1869286.F6FKdkBDy4@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/09/2015 07:52 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, December 09, 2015 03:31:23 PM Jacob Pan wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:38:27 +0100 >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: >> >>> OK, I've put it into my bleeding-edge branch as 4.5 candidate, but do >>> we want it in "stable" and therefore should it be pushed for 4.4? >> yes, it is a bug fix that may affect many systems locked by BIOS. > > So which "stable" series in particular should it go to? All applicable? > Yes, all applicable IMO. P. > Thanks, > Rafael >