linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] KVM: page track: introduce kvm_page_track_{add,remove}_page
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:15:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <566FBDF6.9010009@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448907973-36066-6-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>



On 12/01/2015 02:26 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> These two functions are the user APIs:
> - kvm_page_track_add_page(): add the page to the tracking pool after
>    that later specified access on that page will be tracked
>
> - kvm_page_track_remove_page(): remove the page from the tracking pool,
>    the specified access on the page is not tracked after the last user is
>    gone
>
> Both of these are called under the protection of kvm->srcu or
> kvm->slots_lock
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h |  5 ++
>   arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c             | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> index 347d5c9..9cc17c6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> @@ -10,4 +10,9 @@ int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>   				  unsigned long npages);
>   void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
>   				 struct kvm_memory_slot *dont);
> +
> +void kvm_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> +			     enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
> +void kvm_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> +				enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
>   #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
> index 0338d36..ad510db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
> @@ -56,3 +56,98 @@ void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
>   	if (!dont || free->arch.gfn_track != dont->arch.gfn_track)
>   		page_track_slot_free(free);
>   }
> +
> +static bool check_mode(enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
> +{
> +	if (mode < 0 || mode >= KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> +			     enum kvm_page_track_mode mode, int count)
> +{
> +	int index, val;
> +
> +	index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
> +
> +	slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index] += count;
> +	val = slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index];
> +	WARN_ON(val < 0);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that
> + * page will be intercepted.
> + *
> + * It should be called under the protection of kvm->srcu or kvm->slots_lock
> + *
> + * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
> + * @gfn: the guest page.
> + * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
> + */
> +void kvm_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> +			     enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!check_mode(mode));
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
> +		slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
> +		slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> +
> +		spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +		update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, 1);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * new track stops large page mapping for the
> +		 * tracked page.
> +		 */
> +		kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
Where is  kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage? Neither did I see it in your patch 
nor in my own latest KVM repo without your patch :)

> +
> +		if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
> +			if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
> +				kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
Neither can I find kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect. Did I miss something?

Thanks,
-Kai
> +		spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
> + * of corresponding access on that page. It is the opposed operation of
> + * kvm_page_track_add_page().
> + *
> + * It should be called under the protection of kvm->srcu or kvm->slots_lock
> + *
> + * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
> + * @gfn: the guest page.
> + * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
> + */
> +void kvm_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> +				enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	WARN_ON(!check_mode(mode));
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
> +		slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
> +		slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> +
> +		spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +		update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, -1);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * allow large page mapping for the tracked page
> +		 * after the tracker is gone.
> +		 */
> +		kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
> +		spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +	}
> +}


  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-30 18:26 [PATCH 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 01/11] KVM: MMU: rename has_wrprotected_page to mmu_gfn_lpage_is_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_{allow,disallow}_lpage Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: page track: add the framework of guest page tracking Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-15  7:06   ` Kai Huang
2015-12-15  8:46     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-16  7:33       ` Kai Huang
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: page track: introduce kvm_page_track_{add,remove}_page Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-15  7:15   ` Kai Huang [this message]
2015-12-15  7:56     ` Kai Huang
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: MMU: let page fault handler be aware tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-15  8:11   ` Kai Huang
2015-12-15  9:03     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-16  7:31       ` Kai Huang
2015-12-16  8:23         ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: page track: add notifier support Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-16  5:53   ` Jike Song
2015-12-16  6:26     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: MMU: use page track for non-leaf shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-15  7:52   ` Kai Huang
2015-12-15  7:59     ` Kai Huang
2015-12-15  9:10     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-16  7:51       ` Kai Huang
2015-12-16  8:39         ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-17  2:44           ` Kai Huang
2015-12-17  4:07             ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_need_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-15  8:43   ` Kai Huang
2015-12-15  8:47     ` Kai Huang
2015-12-15  9:26       ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-15  9:25     ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-16  8:05       ` Kai Huang
2015-12-16  8:48         ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-17  2:51           ` Kai Huang
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: clear write-flooding on the fast path of tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2015-11-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: apply page track notifier Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-01 10:17 ` [PATCH 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Paolo Bonzini
2015-12-01 15:02   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-12-01 15:08     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-12-01 17:00   ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-12-05 16:56     ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=566FBDF6.9010009@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kai.huang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).