public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances
@ 2015-12-18  9:44 Linus Walleij
  2015-12-18 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2015-12-18  9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier, Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Walleij

There is currently a hack in the GIC driver making it possible
to pass the number of GIC instances from the platform-specific
include files and thus override the variable MAX_GIC_NR.

With multiplatform deployments, this will not work as we need
to get rid of the platform-specific include files.

It turns out that this feature is only used by the RealView
platform which has a cascaded GIC. So move the configuration
to Kconfig and bump to 2 instances if we're building for the
RealView. The include file hacks can then be removed.

Tested on the ARM PB11MPCore with its cascaded GIC.

Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig   |  5 +++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 4d7294e5d982..bf29a8b2b7c5 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ config ARM_GIC
 	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
 	select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
 
+config ARM_GIC_MAX_NR
+	int
+	default 2 if ARCH_REALVIEW
+	default 1
+
 config ARM_GIC_V2M
 	bool
 	depends on ARM_GIC
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index abf2ffaed392..006a83838857 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -99,11 +99,7 @@ static u8 gic_cpu_map[NR_GIC_CPU_IF] __read_mostly;
 
 static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
 
-#ifndef MAX_GIC_NR
-#define MAX_GIC_NR	1
-#endif
-
-static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR] __read_mostly;
+static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR] __read_mostly;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
 static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
@@ -417,7 +413,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_eoimode1_chip = {
 
 void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
 {
-	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
 		BUG();
 	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq,
 					 &gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -524,7 +520,7 @@ int gic_cpu_if_down(unsigned int gic_nr)
 	void __iomem *cpu_base;
 	u32 val = 0;
 
-	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -548,7 +544,7 @@ static void gic_dist_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
 	void __iomem *dist_base;
 	int i;
 
-	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
 		BUG();
 
 	gic_irqs = gic_data[gic_nr].gic_irqs;
@@ -587,7 +583,7 @@ static void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
 	unsigned int i;
 	void __iomem *dist_base;
 
-	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
 		BUG();
 
 	gic_irqs = gic_data[gic_nr].gic_irqs;
@@ -634,7 +630,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
 	void __iomem *dist_base;
 	void __iomem *cpu_base;
 
-	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
 		BUG();
 
 	dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -664,7 +660,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
 	void __iomem *dist_base;
 	void __iomem *cpu_base;
 
-	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
 		BUG();
 
 	dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -703,7 +699,7 @@ static int gic_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd,	void *v)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_GIC_NR; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR; i++) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
 		/* Skip over unused GICs */
 		if (!gic_data[i].get_base)
@@ -835,7 +831,7 @@ void gic_migrate_target(unsigned int new_cpu_id)
 	int i, ror_val, cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	u32 val, cur_target_mask, active_mask;
 
-	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
 		BUG();
 
 	dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -1040,7 +1036,7 @@ static void __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
 	struct gic_chip_data *gic;
 	int gic_irqs, irq_base, i;
 
-	BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
+	BUG_ON(gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR);
 
 	gic_check_cpu_features();
 
-- 
2.4.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances
  2015-12-18  9:44 [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances Linus Walleij
@ 2015-12-18 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-18 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Walleij, Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-kernel

On 18/12/15 09:44, Linus Walleij wrote:
> There is currently a hack in the GIC driver making it possible
> to pass the number of GIC instances from the platform-specific
> include files and thus override the variable MAX_GIC_NR.
> 
> With multiplatform deployments, this will not work as we need
> to get rid of the platform-specific include files.
> 
> It turns out that this feature is only used by the RealView
> platform which has a cascaded GIC. So move the configuration
> to Kconfig and bump to 2 instances if we're building for the
> RealView. The include file hacks can then be removed.
> 
> Tested on the ARM PB11MPCore with its cascaded GIC.
> 
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Excellent, thanks Linus. I've taken the liberty of performing a small
change as outlined below:

> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig   |  5 +++++
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 4d7294e5d982..bf29a8b2b7c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ config ARM_GIC
>  	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
>  	select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
>  
> +config ARM_GIC_MAX_NR
> +	int
> +	default 2 if ARCH_REALVIEW
> +	default 1
> +
>  config ARM_GIC_V2M
>  	bool
>  	depends on ARM_GIC
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index abf2ffaed392..006a83838857 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -99,11 +99,7 @@ static u8 gic_cpu_map[NR_GIC_CPU_IF] __read_mostly;
>  
>  static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
>  
> -#ifndef MAX_GIC_NR
> -#define MAX_GIC_NR	1
> -#endif
> -
> -static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR] __read_mostly;
> +static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR] __read_mostly;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
>  static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
> @@ -417,7 +413,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_eoimode1_chip = {
>  
>  void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
>  {
> -	if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> +	if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
>  		BUG();

I have replaced these statements with:

	BUG_ON(gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR);

which have the same effect, and are vaguely nicer.

I've pushed it on my irq/gic-4.5 branch.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-18 10:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-18  9:44 [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances Linus Walleij
2015-12-18 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox