* [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances
@ 2015-12-18 9:44 Linus Walleij
2015-12-18 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2015-12-18 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Marc Zyngier, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Walleij
There is currently a hack in the GIC driver making it possible
to pass the number of GIC instances from the platform-specific
include files and thus override the variable MAX_GIC_NR.
With multiplatform deployments, this will not work as we need
to get rid of the platform-specific include files.
It turns out that this feature is only used by the RealView
platform which has a cascaded GIC. So move the configuration
to Kconfig and bump to 2 instances if we're building for the
RealView. The include file hacks can then be removed.
Tested on the ARM PB11MPCore with its cascaded GIC.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 5 +++++
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 4d7294e5d982..bf29a8b2b7c5 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ config ARM_GIC
select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
+config ARM_GIC_MAX_NR
+ int
+ default 2 if ARCH_REALVIEW
+ default 1
+
config ARM_GIC_V2M
bool
depends on ARM_GIC
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index abf2ffaed392..006a83838857 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -99,11 +99,7 @@ static u8 gic_cpu_map[NR_GIC_CPU_IF] __read_mostly;
static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
-#ifndef MAX_GIC_NR
-#define MAX_GIC_NR 1
-#endif
-
-static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR] __read_mostly;
+static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR] __read_mostly;
#ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
@@ -417,7 +413,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_eoimode1_chip = {
void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
{
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+ if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
BUG();
irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq,
&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -524,7 +520,7 @@ int gic_cpu_if_down(unsigned int gic_nr)
void __iomem *cpu_base;
u32 val = 0;
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+ if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
return -EINVAL;
cpu_base = gic_data_cpu_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -548,7 +544,7 @@ static void gic_dist_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
void __iomem *dist_base;
int i;
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+ if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
BUG();
gic_irqs = gic_data[gic_nr].gic_irqs;
@@ -587,7 +583,7 @@ static void gic_dist_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
unsigned int i;
void __iomem *dist_base;
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+ if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
BUG();
gic_irqs = gic_data[gic_nr].gic_irqs;
@@ -634,7 +630,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_save(unsigned int gic_nr)
void __iomem *dist_base;
void __iomem *cpu_base;
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+ if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
BUG();
dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -664,7 +660,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_restore(unsigned int gic_nr)
void __iomem *dist_base;
void __iomem *cpu_base;
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+ if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
BUG();
dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -703,7 +699,7 @@ static int gic_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v)
{
int i;
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_GIC_NR; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR; i++) {
#ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
/* Skip over unused GICs */
if (!gic_data[i].get_base)
@@ -835,7 +831,7 @@ void gic_migrate_target(unsigned int new_cpu_id)
int i, ror_val, cpu = smp_processor_id();
u32 val, cur_target_mask, active_mask;
- if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
+ if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
BUG();
dist_base = gic_data_dist_base(&gic_data[gic_nr]);
@@ -1040,7 +1036,7 @@ static void __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
struct gic_chip_data *gic;
int gic_irqs, irq_base, i;
- BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
+ BUG_ON(gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR);
gic_check_cpu_features();
--
2.4.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances
2015-12-18 9:44 [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances Linus Walleij
@ 2015-12-18 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2015-12-18 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Walleij, Thomas Gleixner, Jason Cooper, Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-kernel
On 18/12/15 09:44, Linus Walleij wrote:
> There is currently a hack in the GIC driver making it possible
> to pass the number of GIC instances from the platform-specific
> include files and thus override the variable MAX_GIC_NR.
>
> With multiplatform deployments, this will not work as we need
> to get rid of the platform-specific include files.
>
> It turns out that this feature is only used by the RealView
> platform which has a cascaded GIC. So move the configuration
> to Kconfig and bump to 2 instances if we're building for the
> RealView. The include file hacks can then be removed.
>
> Tested on the ARM PB11MPCore with its cascaded GIC.
>
> Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Excellent, thanks Linus. I've taken the liberty of performing a small
change as outlined below:
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 4d7294e5d982..bf29a8b2b7c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ config ARM_GIC
> select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
> select MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
>
> +config ARM_GIC_MAX_NR
> + int
> + default 2 if ARCH_REALVIEW
> + default 1
> +
> config ARM_GIC_V2M
> bool
> depends on ARM_GIC
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index abf2ffaed392..006a83838857 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -99,11 +99,7 @@ static u8 gic_cpu_map[NR_GIC_CPU_IF] __read_mostly;
>
> static struct static_key supports_deactivate = STATIC_KEY_INIT_TRUE;
>
> -#ifndef MAX_GIC_NR
> -#define MAX_GIC_NR 1
> -#endif
> -
> -static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX_GIC_NR] __read_mostly;
> +static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR] __read_mostly;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
> @@ -417,7 +413,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gic_eoimode1_chip = {
>
> void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
> {
> - if (gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR)
> + if (gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR)
> BUG();
I have replaced these statements with:
BUG_ON(gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR);
which have the same effect, and are vaguely nicer.
I've pushed it on my irq/gic-4.5 branch.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-18 10:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-18 9:44 [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Kconfig the number of instances Linus Walleij
2015-12-18 10:40 ` Marc Zyngier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox