From: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@canonical.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ideapad: Report hard block off if it is never on
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:33:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5678C48C.7060604@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151218225653.GD15346@malice.jf.intel.com>
On 12/19/2015 06:56 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:49:33AM +0800, Ike Panhc wrote:
>
> Hi Ike,
>
> +David Woodhouse (MODULE_AUTHOR)
>
>> Hardware radio switch is rare on recently ideapad and some of them
>> reported radio hardware blocked by error. With more and more ideapads
>> available in market to maintain the dmi table becomes a
>> never-finished job.
>
> Indeed, inverting this logic or eliminating it would be an improvement.
>
> To be clear, the only platforms which need to be listed in the DMI table are
> those without a hw radio switch AND which will report hw_blocked when the ACPI
> VPCCMD_R_RF call is made (instead of always returning 0 as they should)?
>
> As such, the DMI list is a list of laptops with buggy firmware - correct?
>
>> Therefore I am thinking an easy way to detect by response from
>> hardware. This patch will make driver says hardware switch is not
>> blocked if the response from ACPI is always radio blocked.
>>
>> For an ideapad without radio switch, no matter what ACPI says, driver
>> will report false on hardware blocked.
>>
>> For an ideapad with radio switch, if driver loaded with radio on, no
>> behavior is changed.
>>
>> For an ideapad with radio switch and driver loaded with radio off,
>> driver will report unblocked falsely and network manager might not
>> scan if wireless driver reports blocked. Once the switch is on,
>> driver will report correct information.
>
>
> This would be a regression for existing platforms though.
>
> Do we have the ASL for some of the offending models compared with the good ones
> so we can inspect and look for a deterministic detection mechanism?
Thanks for the suggestion. It makes sense to me.
Unfortunately I do not have one yet. Let me ask for acpidump for them.
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ike Panhc <ike.pan@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> index a313dfc..91ccb4e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> @@ -482,11 +482,16 @@ static void ideapad_sync_rfk_state(struct ideapad_private *priv)
>> {
>> unsigned long hw_blocked = 0;
>> int i;
>> + static int hw_unblock_once;
>>
>> if (priv->has_hw_rfkill_switch) {
>> if (read_ec_data(priv->adev->handle, VPCCMD_R_RF, &hw_blocked))
>> return;
>> + if (hw_blocked)
>> + hw_unblock_once = 1;
>> hw_blocked = !hw_blocked;
>> + if (!hw_unblock_once)
>> + hw_blocked = 0;
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < IDEAPAD_RFKILL_DEV_NUM; i++)
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-22 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-16 3:49 [PATCH] ideapad: Report hard block off if it is never on Ike Panhc
2015-12-18 22:56 ` Darren Hart
2015-12-22 3:33 ` Ike Panhc [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5678C48C.7060604@canonical.com \
--to=ike.pan@canonical.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox