public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next v3 6/8] watchdog: mei_wdt: register wd device only if required
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:18:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5678DD1F.6080300@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450739881-3923-7-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com>

On 12/21/2015 03:17 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> From: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
>
> For Intel Broadwell and newer platforms, the ME device can inform
> the host whether the watchdog functionality is activated or not.
> If the watchdog functionality is not activated then the watchdog interface
> can be not registered and eliminate unnecessary pings and hence lower the
> power consumption by avoiding waking up the device.
> The feature can be deactivated also without reboot
> in that case the watchdog device should be unregistered at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
> ---
> V2: rework unregistration
> V3: rebase; implement unregistraion also at runtime
>
>   drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 169 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
> index ab9aec218d69..3cd80aa75db1 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/mei_wdt.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>   #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>   #include <linux/watchdog.h>
>
>   #include <linux/uuid.h>
> @@ -38,24 +39,30 @@
>
>   /* Sub Commands */
>   #define MEI_MC_START_WD_TIMER_REQ  0x13
> +#define MEI_MC_START_WD_TIMER_RES  0x83
> +#define   MEI_WDT_STATUS_SUCCESS 0
> +#define   MEI_WDT_WDSTATE_NOT_REQUIRED 0x1
>   #define MEI_MC_STOP_WD_TIMER_REQ   0x14
>
>   /**
>    * enum mei_wdt_state - internal watchdog state
>    *
> + * @MEI_WDT_PROBE: wd in probing stage
>    * @MEI_WDT_IDLE: wd is idle and not opened
>    * @MEI_WDT_START: wd was opened, start was called
>    * @MEI_WDT_RUNNING: wd is expecting keep alive pings
>    * @MEI_WDT_STOPPING: wd is stopping and will move to IDLE
> + * @MEI_WDT_NOT_REQUIRED: wd device is not required
>    */
>   enum mei_wdt_state {
> +	MEI_WDT_PROBE,
>   	MEI_WDT_IDLE,
>   	MEI_WDT_START,
>   	MEI_WDT_RUNNING,
>   	MEI_WDT_STOPPING,
> +	MEI_WDT_NOT_REQUIRED,
>   };
>
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>   static const char *mei_wdt_state_str(enum mei_wdt_state state)
>   {
>   	switch (state) {
> @@ -71,7 +78,6 @@ static const char *mei_wdt_state_str(enum mei_wdt_state state)
>   		return "unknown";
>   	}
>   }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
>
>   struct mei_wdt;
>
> @@ -94,6 +100,10 @@ struct mei_wdt_dev {
>    *
>    * @cldev: mei watchdog client device
>    * @state: watchdog internal state
> + * @resp_required: ping required response
> + * @response: ping response completion
> + * @unregister: unregister worker
> + * @reg_lock: watchdog device registration lock
>    * @timeout: watchdog current timeout
>    *
>    * @dbgfs_dir: debugfs dir entry
> @@ -103,6 +113,10 @@ struct mei_wdt {
>
>   	struct mei_cl_device *cldev;
>   	enum mei_wdt_state state;
> +	bool resp_required;
> +	struct completion response;
> +	struct work_struct unregister;
> +	struct mutex reg_lock;
>   	u16 timeout;
>
>   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> @@ -139,6 +153,19 @@ struct mei_wdt_start_request {
>   } __packed;
>
>   /**
> + * struct mei_wdt_start_response watchdog start/ping response
> + *
> + * @hdr: Management Control Command Header
> + * @status: operation status
> + * @wdstate: watchdog status bit mask
> + */
> +struct mei_wdt_start_response {
> +	struct mei_mc_hdr hdr;
> +	u8 status;
> +	u8 wdstate;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/**
>    * struct mei_wdt_stop_request - watchdog stop
>    *
>    * @hdr: Management Control Command Header
> @@ -277,13 +304,18 @@ static int mei_wdt_ops_ping(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
>   	if (wdt->state != MEI_WDT_START && wdt->state != MEI_WDT_RUNNING)
>   		return 0;
>
> +	if (wdt->resp_required)
> +		init_completion(&wdt->response);
> +
> +	wdt->state = MEI_WDT_RUNNING;
>   	ret = mei_wdt_ping(wdt);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return ret;
>
> -	wdt->state = MEI_WDT_RUNNING;

The state is now set to RUNNING even if the ping failed.
Is that on purpose ?

> +	if (wdt->resp_required)
> +		ret = wait_for_completion_killable(&wdt->response);
>
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>   }
>
>   /**
> @@ -358,15 +390,22 @@ static struct watchdog_info wd_info = {
>    */
>   static void mei_wdt_unregister(struct mei_wdt *wdt)
>   {
> -	struct mei_wdt_dev *mwd = wdt->mwd;
> +	struct mei_wdt_dev *mwd;
>
> -	if (!mwd)
> -		return;
> +	mutex_lock(&wdt->reg_lock);
> +
> +	if (!wdt->mwd)
> +		goto out;
> +

Is this because the error on registration was ignored ?
Trying to understand the rationale for this check.

> +	mwd = wdt->mwd;
>
>   	watchdog_unregister_device(&mwd->wdd);
> +

It would be better to make such changes in an earlier patch and avoid the
whitespace change here.

>   	wdt->mwd = NULL;
> -	wdt->state = MEI_WDT_IDLE;
>   	kref_put(&mwd->refcnt, mei_wdt_release);
> +
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&wdt->reg_lock);
>   }
>
>   /**
> @@ -387,9 +426,13 @@ static int mei_wdt_register(struct mei_wdt *wdt)
>
>   	dev = &wdt->cldev->dev;
>
> +	mutex_lock(&wdt->reg_lock);
> +
>   	mwd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mei_wdt_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!mwd)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (!mwd) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>
>   	mwd->wdt = wdt;
>   	mwd->wdd.info = &wd_info;
> @@ -405,13 +448,104 @@ static int mei_wdt_register(struct mei_wdt *wdt)
>   	if (ret) {
>   		dev_err(dev, "unable to register watchdog device = %d.\n", ret);
>   		kref_put(&mwd->refcnt, mei_wdt_release);
> -		return ret;
> +		goto out;
>   	}
>
>   	wdt->mwd = mwd;
> +out:
> +	mutex_unlock(&wdt->reg_lock);
>   	return 0;

Do you want to return ret here ? Otherwise some of the code above does
not really make sense (ie setting ret).

>   }
>
> +static void mei_wdt_unregister_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct mei_wdt *wdt = container_of(work, struct mei_wdt, unregister);
> +
> +	mei_wdt_unregister(wdt);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mei_wdt_event_rx - callback for data receive
> + *
> + * @cldev: bus device
> + */
> +static void mei_wdt_event_rx(struct mei_cl_device *cldev)
> +{
> +	struct mei_wdt *wdt = mei_cldev_get_drvdata(cldev);
> +	struct mei_wdt_start_response res;
> +	const size_t res_len = sizeof(res);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = mei_cldev_recv(wdt->cldev, (u8 *)&res, res_len);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&cldev->dev, "failure in recv %d\n", ret);

Not objecting, just concerned. Can those error messages
result in filling up the kernel log if the mei hardware has a problem ?

 From an operational perspective, is it acceptable to ignore the errors ?

> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Empty response can be sent on stop */
> +	if (ret == 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (ret < sizeof(struct mei_mc_hdr)) {
> +		dev_err(&cldev->dev, "recv small data %d\n", ret);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (res.hdr.command != MEI_MANAGEMENT_CONTROL ||
> +	    res.hdr.versionnumber != MEI_MC_VERSION_NUMBER) {
> +		dev_err(&cldev->dev, "wrong command received\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (res.hdr.subcommand != MEI_MC_START_WD_TIMER_RES) {
> +		dev_warn(&cldev->dev, "unsupported command %d :%s[%d]\n",
> +			 res.hdr.subcommand,
> +			 mei_wdt_state_str(wdt->state),
> +			 wdt->state);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (wdt->state == MEI_WDT_RUNNING) {
> +		if (res.wdstate & MEI_WDT_WDSTATE_NOT_REQUIRED) {
> +			wdt->state = MEI_WDT_NOT_REQUIRED;
> +			schedule_work(&wdt->unregister);
> +		}
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (wdt->state == MEI_WDT_PROBE) {
> +		if (res.wdstate & MEI_WDT_WDSTATE_NOT_REQUIRED) {
> +			wdt->state = MEI_WDT_NOT_REQUIRED;
> +		} else {
> +			/* stop the ping register watchdog device */

Should this be "stop the watchdog" ?

> +			mei_wdt_stop(wdt);
> +			mei_wdt_register(wdt);
> +		}
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_warn(&cldev->dev, "not in correct state %s[%d]\n",
> +			 mei_wdt_state_str(wdt->state), wdt->state);
> +
> +out:
> +	if (!completion_done(&wdt->response))
> +		complete(&wdt->response);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * mei_wdt_event - callback for event receive
> + *
> + * @cldev: bus device
> + * @events: event mask
> + * @context: callback context
> + */
> +static void mei_wdt_event(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
> +			  u32 events, void *context)
> +{
> +	if (events & BIT(MEI_CL_EVENT_RX))
> +		mei_wdt_event_rx(cldev);
> +}
> +
>   #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>
>   static ssize_t mei_dbgfs_read_state(struct file *file, char __user *ubuf,
> @@ -482,8 +616,13 @@ static int mei_wdt_probe(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>
>   	wdt->timeout = MEI_WDT_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
> -	wdt->state = MEI_WDT_IDLE;
> +	wdt->state = MEI_WDT_PROBE;
>   	wdt->cldev = cldev;
> +	wdt->resp_required = mei_cldev_ver(cldev) > 0x1;
> +	mutex_init(&wdt->reg_lock);
> +	init_completion(&wdt->response);
> +	INIT_WORK(&wdt->unregister, mei_wdt_unregister_work);
> +
>   	mei_cldev_set_drvdata(cldev, wdt);
>
>   	ret = mei_cldev_enable(cldev);
> @@ -492,9 +631,19 @@ static int mei_wdt_probe(struct mei_cl_device *cldev,
>   		goto err_out;
>   	}
>
> +	ret = mei_cldev_register_event_cb(wdt->cldev, BIT(MEI_CL_EVENT_RX),
> +					  mei_wdt_event, NULL);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&cldev->dev, "Could not register event ret=%d\n", ret);
> +		goto err_disable;
> +	}
> +
Can there be an event before the call to mei_wdt_register() ?
If so, it that case handled correctly ?

>   	wd_info.firmware_version = mei_cldev_ver(cldev);
>
> -	ret = mei_wdt_register(wdt);
> +	if (wdt->resp_required)
> +		ret = mei_wdt_ping(wdt);
> +	else
> +		ret = mei_wdt_register(wdt);
>   	if (ret)
>   		goto err_disable;
>
> @@ -515,6 +664,12 @@ static int mei_wdt_remove(struct mei_cl_device *cldev)
>   {
>   	struct mei_wdt *wdt = mei_cldev_get_drvdata(cldev);
>
> +	/* Free the caller in case of fw initiated or unexpected reset */
> +	if (!completion_done(&wdt->response))
> +		complete(&wdt->response);
> +
> +	cancel_work_sync(&wdt->unregister);
> +
>   	mei_wdt_unregister(wdt);
>
can there be an event callback after mei_wdt_unregister() but before mei_cldev_disable() ?
If so, is the situation handled or would it result in a race condition ?

[ I think it is ok in both cases, just trying to make sure I didn't miss anything ]

>   	mei_cldev_disable(cldev);
> @@ -530,7 +685,7 @@ static int mei_wdt_remove(struct mei_cl_device *cldev)
>   			    0x89, 0x9D, 0xA9, 0x15, 0x14, 0xCB, 0x32, 0xAB)
>
>   static struct mei_cl_device_id mei_wdt_tbl[] = {
> -	{ .uuid = MEI_UUID_WD, .version = 0x1},
> +	{ .uuid = MEI_UUID_WD, .version = MEI_CL_VERSION_ANY },
>   	/* required last entry */
>   	{ }
>   };
>


  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-21 23:17 [char-misc-next v3 0/8] mei: create proper iAMT watchdog driver Tomas Winkler
2015-12-21 23:17 ` [char-misc-next v3 1/8] mei: drop nfc leftovers from the mei driver Tomas Winkler
2015-12-21 23:17 ` [char-misc-next v3 2/8] mei: wd: drop the watchdog code from the core " Tomas Winkler
2015-12-21 23:17 ` [char-misc-next v3 3/8] watchdog: mei_wdt: implement MEI iAMT watchdog driver Tomas Winkler
2015-12-22  4:58   ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-22  7:19     ` Winkler, Tomas
2015-12-22  7:40       ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-23 22:38         ` Winkler, Tomas
2015-12-24  0:23           ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-21 23:17 ` [char-misc-next v3 4/8] watchdog: mei_wdt: add status debugfs entry Tomas Winkler
2015-12-22  5:30   ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-23 22:48     ` Winkler, Tomas
2015-12-24  0:25       ` Guenter Roeck
2015-12-21 23:17 ` [char-misc-next v3 5/8] mei: bus: whitelist the watchdog client Tomas Winkler
2015-12-21 23:17 ` [char-misc-next v3 6/8] watchdog: mei_wdt: register wd device only if required Tomas Winkler
2015-12-22  5:18   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-12-23 23:01     ` Winkler, Tomas
2015-12-21 23:18 ` [char-misc-next v3 7/8] watchdog: mei_wdt: add activation debugfs entry Tomas Winkler
2015-12-21 23:18 ` [char-misc-next v3 8/8] watchdog: mei_wdt: re-register device on event Tomas Winkler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5678DD1F.6080300@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    --cc=wim@iguana.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox