From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"open list:SYSTEM CONTROL & POWER INTERFACE (SCPI) Message..."
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:48:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <567A7BF8.1030107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450867041-729-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com>
On 23/12/15 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
There has a patch posted by Dan Carpenter [1] which I reposted[2],
but it again slipped through the cracks. I will poke Rafael again on that.
[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/380292.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/219
--
Regards,
Sudeep
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-23 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 10:37 [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 22:35 ` Ray Jui
2015-12-24 5:33 ` Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
2015-12-24 9:03 ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] NFC: nci: fix handling return value of nci_hci_create_pipe Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24 0:04 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24 5:56 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24 6:14 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24 7:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24 7:38 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-30 17:12 ` Mark Brown
2015-12-23 10:41 ` [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id Viresh Kumar
2015-12-23 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=567A7BF8.1030107@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox