From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752205AbcAEFKl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:10:41 -0500
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:50004 "EHLO
	szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750823AbcAEFKj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 00:10:39 -0500
Message-ID: <568B4FEF.5030508@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:09:03 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <will.deacon@arm.com>
CC: <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>, <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, <pi3orama@163.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: perf test: Improbe bp_signal
References: <20160104165535.GI1616@arm.com> <1451969880-14877-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <1451969880-14877-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.111.66.109]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
	refid=str=0001.0A020205.568B4FFC.00DA,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
	ip=0.0.0.0,
	so=2013-06-18 04:22:30,
	dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: b4fd1cd88c84c8dea68b3256367f7ebe
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On 2016/1/5 12:58, Wang Nan wrote:
> Will Deacon [1] has some question on patch [2]. This patch improves
> test__bp_signal so we can test:
>
>   1. A watchpoint and a breakpoint that fire on the same instruction
>   2. Nested signals
>
> For detail of this patch see the comment in patch body.
>
> Test result:
>
>   On both x86_64:

On x86_64 and arm64.

Sorry.