From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753784AbcAEGg5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 01:36:57 -0500
Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:23147 "EHLO
	heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752568AbcAEGgz (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 01:36:55 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,346,1444665600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="2224237"
Message-ID: <568B629E.5010806@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 14:28:46 +0800
From: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>, <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Propose] Isolate core_pattern in mnt namespace.
References: <56729B3D.1040502@cn.fujitsu.com>	<56760F05.3020308@cn.fujitsu.com>	<20151220023712.GT20997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>	<567616D6.6060202@cn.fujitsu.com>	<87fuyx1mfn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>	<567798EC.1040304@cn.fujitsu.com>	<87twnbzcz8.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>	<567A1120.3070204@cn.fujitsu.com> <8760zpxgte.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
In-Reply-To: <8760zpxgte.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.66]
X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: D28974189102.A744A
X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 12/24/2015 12:36 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
[...]

Hi Eric,
	Happy new year and sorry for the late reply.
>
> Given the other constraints on an implementation the pid namespace looks
> by far the one best suited to host such a sysctl if it is possible to
> implement safely.

So you think it's better to isolate the core_pattern in pid_namespace,
am I right?

But, core_file_path and user_mode_helper_path in core_pattern are much
more related with mnt_namespace IMO.

Could you help to explain it more?

Thanx
Yang
>
> Eric
>
>
> .
>