From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754992AbcAHNMM (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:12:12 -0500 Received: from lucky1.263xmail.com ([211.157.147.130]:34946 "EHLO lucky1.263xmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751211AbcAHNMI (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:12:08 -0500 X-263anti-spam: KSV:0; X-MAIL-GRAY: 1 X-MAIL-DELIVERY: 0 X-KSVirus-check: 0 X-ABS-CHECKED: 4 X-ADDR-CHECKED: 0 X-RL-SENDER: wdc@rock-chips.com X-FST-TO: david.wu@rock-chips.com X-SENDER-IP: 58.22.7.114 X-LOGIN-NAME: wdc@rock-chips.com X-UNIQUE-TAG: <9c46a80c1ed2285a56a98230149e3753> X-ATTACHMENT-NUM: 0 X-DNS-TYPE: 0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] i2c: rk3x: add calc_divs ops for new version To: Wolfram Sang , Andy Shevchenko References: <1449844384-6236-1-git-send-email-wdc@rock-chips.com> <566F5FAC.3080404@rock-chips.com> <20160104194042.GD1522@katana> Cc: Jianqun Xu , =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=c3=bcbner?= , dianders@chromium.org, huangtao@rock-chips.com, zyw@rock-chips.com, hl@rock-chips.com, xjq@rock-chips.com, linux-arm Mailing List , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , David Wu From: "David.Wu" Message-ID: <568FB5BD.9050809@rock-chips.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:12:29 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160104194042.GD1522@katana> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfram, Andy Thanks for your suggestion. I will use i2c_parse_fw_timings() function to replace it. 在 2016/1/5 3:40, Wolfram Sang 写道: >>>> +static int rk3x_i2c_v0_calc_divs(unsigned long clk_rate, unsigned long >>>> scl_rate, >>>> + unsigned long scl_rise_ns, >>>> + unsigned long scl_fall_ns, >>>> + unsigned long sda_fall_ns, >> Wolfram did some sturct to assign the parameters from device properties. >> It might be re-used here. > Yes, I think it makes sense to convert the driver first to use > the new i2c_parse_fw_timings() function and see if it fits (or if we need > to extend it perhaps). > > David, does this make sense to you? >