From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932065AbcAHOca (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:32:30 -0500
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([58.251.152.64]:38195 "EHLO
	szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750831AbcAHOc2 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:32:28 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] HiSilicon SAS v2 hw support
To: <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
References: <1452262542-64589-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
CC: <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>, <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        <galak@codeaurora.org>, <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
        <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
        <john.garry2@mail.dcu.ie>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <JBottomley@odin.com>
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <568FC832.60108@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:31:14 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1452262542-64589-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.203.181.152]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
	refid=str=0001.0A020203.568FC851.02CF,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
	ip=0.0.0.0,
	so=2013-06-18 04:22:30,
	dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 760cc48d3c9a8661e8ad9ff30d3510d3
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

My patchset was bounced by JBottomley@odin.com

It seems sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com had the same issue earlier this 
week, but other contributors seem to continue using the same address - 
shall I resend with alternate address?