From: Wan Zongshun <vw@iommu.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Cc: Wan Zongshun <vincent.wan@amd.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ray Huang <ray.huang@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
ken.xue@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] iommu/amd: Add support for non-pci devices
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:52:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568FCD4B.4000807@iommu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160108121855.GU18805@8bytes.org>
>>
>>
>> static bool check_device(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> u16 devid;
>> ......
>>
>> /* No PCI device */
>> if (!dev_is_pci(dev) && (get_acpihid_device_id(dev, NULL) < 0))
>> return false;
>>
>> devid = get_device_id(dev);
>
> That is true for this case, but the other call-sites of get_device_id()
> still have to care about a potential negative return value, right?
>
Actually I am supposing the '.add_device' will be the first called in
iommu initializing stage, so I think as long as having no error of check
device here, any call-sites of get_device_id() will be fine, because
adding device successfully should be the pre-condition of any iommu
function can be performed, please correct me.
static int amd_iommu_add_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data;
struct iommu_domain *domain;
struct amd_iommu *iommu;
u16 devid;
int ret;
if (!check_device(dev) || get_dev_data(dev))
return 0;
devid = get_device_id(dev);
iommu = amd_iommu_rlookup_table[devid];
Vincent.
>
> Joerg
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-08 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-05 10:07 [PATCH 0/6] iommu/amd: enable ACPI hardware ID device support Wan Zongshun
2016-01-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] iommu/amd: Modify ivhd_header structure to support type 11h and 40h Wan Zongshun
2016-01-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] iommu/amd: Use the most comprehensive IVHD type that the driver can support Wan Zongshun
2016-01-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] iommu/amd: Add new map for storing IVHD dev entry type HID Wan Zongshun
2016-01-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] iommu/amd: Introduces ivrs_acpihid kernel parameter Wan Zongshun
2016-01-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] iommu/amd: Add support for non-pci devices Wan Zongshun
2016-01-07 12:04 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-01-08 3:15 ` Wan ZongShun
2016-01-08 12:18 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-01-08 14:52 ` Wan Zongshun [this message]
2016-01-08 17:01 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-01-09 9:47 ` Wan Zongshun
2016-01-20 12:00 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-01-05 10:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] iommu/amd: Manage iommu_group " Wan Zongshun
2016-01-07 12:06 ` Joerg Roedel
2016-01-08 1:44 ` Wan ZongShun
2016-01-05 15:40 ` [PATCH 0/6] iommu/amd: enable ACPI hardware ID device support Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568FCD4B.4000807@iommu.org \
--to=vw@iommu.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=ken.xue@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcuos.com@gmail.com \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=vincent.wan@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).