From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, yi1.lai@intel.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org,
tglx@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/x86: Fix sysret_rip assertion failure on FRED systems
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:50:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568aa6c4-6802-4eb5-b412-e3aa93ed9b29@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43f2c5c2-6327-4546-b204-5c66b704042e@citrix.com>
On 3/20/26 08:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> First, CPUID doesn't tell you if FRED is in use. Is it even on by
>> default yet? There might not be a better way to do this than checking
>> CPUID, but checking CPUID is imprecise at best.
> A reliable way to distinguish IDT and FRED mode is to:
>
> 1) Load $3 into %fs (x86_64) or %gs (i386) (i.e. whichever isn't thread
> local stoage)
> 2) execute a breakpoint, ignore the signal
> 3) Look to see whether %fs/%gs holds 3 or 0
>
> IRET has a fun behaviour where it zeroes NULL selectors even if they had
> a non-zero RPL.
>
> ERETU doesn't do this; Andy Luto and I asked for this minor information
> leak to be removed, and Intel agreed as it served no purpose anyone
> could identify.
>
> As a consequence, you can use it to determine whether the kernel used
> IRET or ERET to return back to userspace.
I was thinking of just grepping /proc/cpuinfo for "fred", but that
sounds much more fun! :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-20 6:33 [PATCH] selftests/x86: Fix sysret_rip assertion failure on FRED systems Yi Lai
2026-03-20 14:31 ` Dave Hansen
2026-03-20 15:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-20 15:50 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2026-03-22 6:13 ` Xin Li
2026-03-23 6:06 ` Lai, Yi
2026-03-23 16:19 ` Xin Li
2026-03-23 19:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-23 19:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-23 20:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-24 14:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-24 14:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-24 14:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-24 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-22 20:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2026-03-23 5:55 ` Lai, Yi
2026-03-23 16:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2026-03-24 1:28 ` Lai, Yi
2026-03-24 11:08 ` David Laight
2026-03-24 14:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568aa6c4-6802-4eb5-b412-e3aa93ed9b29@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox