From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754701AbcAMEfl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:35:41 -0500
Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:4409 "EHLO
	hqemgate14.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754103AbcAMEfj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:35:39 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed;
	by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:18:25 -0800
Message-ID: <5695D1AF.9000806@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:55:19 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <pawel.moll@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, <galak@codeaurora.org>,
        <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <gnurou@gmail.com>, <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        <broonie@kernel.org>, <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
        <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
CC: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>, <swarren@nvidia.com>,
        <treding@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/6] rtc: max77xxx: add RTC driver for Maxim MAX77xxx
 series RTC IP
References: <1452590273-16421-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <1452590273-16421-6-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com> <569594F0.4020007@samsung.com> <5695CD73.5010709@nvidia.com> <5695D268.3060705@samsung.com>
In-Reply-To: <5695D268.3060705@samsung.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.19.65.30]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DRUKMAIL102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.20) To
 bgmail102.nvidia.com (10.25.59.11)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


On Wednesday 13 January 2016 09:58 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13.01.2016 13:07, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 January 2016 05:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> That is also fine to me but still I am not comfortable with the config
>> name and driver file name as this does not suggest the common.
> The name does not matter. Really. We have a lot of drivers with a
> specific device-like name and supporting different devices. To point
> that your argument is invalid - your initial name of driver
> "rtc-max77620.c" supported totally different "names": the max77620 and
> max20024. It also wasn't suggesting something "common"...
In all config string, I have mentioned the MAX20024.


> With my approach we are not developing common think neither. We just
> want to extend/re-use existing max77686 (or max77802) driver for new
> devices. Just like everywhere else.

OK, fine to me if this is acceptable.
I will drop this rtc patch form this series and work in max77686 driver 
to modify first and once merged, use this config on my defconfig.