From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754301AbcAOST5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:19:57 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:64468 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753905AbcAOSTu (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:19:50 -0500 Subject: Re: InfiniBand-ocrdma: Delete unnecessary variable initialisations in 11 functions To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <567EDED5.4040201@users.sourceforge.net> <5697D865.5010507@users.sourceforge.net> <5697DE31.9040309@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115132014.GC30615@leon.nu> <56990733.7000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115150935.GA32346@leon.nu> <56990FAC.6000506@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115155938.GB32346@leon.nu> <56991D52.8030808@users.sourceforge.net> <20160115170048.GC32346@leon.nu> From: SF Markus Elfring X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Cc: Devesh Sharma , Doug Ledford , Hal Rosenstock , Mitesh Ahuja , Sean Hefty , Selvin Xavier , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Message-ID: <56993833.2050809@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:19:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160115170048.GC32346@leon.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fgpW0Kxt2aMBY11t0TxfIekc5DmkjEnc0RO+Pv5Dj3uBHvUhOBR hVckJWiaIX2CtPflWEEz+RVDllgzeMlLmEaIyJO06Ll1+ZAfRacv3AcLqhsm8B9QjMQx9eF JOTNYxOKKFlzh0marbS90vcBPtyaSGIVuaBtXGm5aPft3Dx/DmtGqNmIDWoPg+NuSGNjAG5 YCd1Rpmhu2XvUzz1k6N7A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:LakKv1usw7o=:Sv1HUUr5F0L7B+Z6KPrWvP nK0xvAHE3q4xoPLYLCZzqEpT2Vn8X5f48cIrrIVFu4sgkMA2/o1xFYBlFDkCTwIpCLYTPkVpy k4grmjjhuWogmiLAZqwvtLpaa90ZN3vO8DeZpvofaotD43SCObfKC1P13hKfPFjW4wvHhA93P B/qVJauK530N5W23okE0/31oaUcMg7Ho/gnEPSNGw8lb9goDSKMOG7xzOrmETu3Vcg4Zi+Tzs hY7lHnr59FPZOVuw/cKnhT/forZE68DoTQRbUQ1vz3M1n5cOpOU15s2wgS6sH1BNx74KiRsoi 7YhDvV8ZcaKTlezTZMeC28b+5RlT1co5lrto0UMSpE26gadt/Zrj+azDPl20GMmAkOVKn6t+m xuwMmI5GY4QTPxYiuSL3cGn+x9K42LgrYddS7jiinLd/HkjQnU9vML4n/XXFj5oJynx2verLp KyfL61ACCqZZDmy3jP9N4+0Xjzg4MXcfkoH98XGlU+aXTW+ksHm1sqBZNLK0P8p0AZdV3wfrn dYvY/xN77SrwR0lmufsiyOqMuBZdpyE+CyYRza+TcehX91S4JmUyylxoJCM9gxi9eJnx3XyRo 8xOl+9afDZ5KgYJgOObaP7Dn744bx6UKdpd2xt7OFZFPOPqFCaGL7yTbUgEBpzMr6AZxXA/NX +9ifSs6NkIy/M6wNoFBuvz52yXezW4WEJ2H9XlFPIoNo5lLfvqsPhNY1Ktdfevg5YOqqLkt/F 9MJNmpHmPsdqTYglYeUGK8EzlFbWpgNMVKemgbRpocjA/VwYA8HqKah0RSDwBAx3oZzKDG5jC 8uEaO1V Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [Q.] What did you try to achieve by this patch? I would appreciate a bit more fine-tuning in the affected source files. > P.S. This is mailing list for developers Do you try to express any further restrictions? > and not for patch bots. Would you like to explain such an information a bit more? > We are glad to see patches that clean the code, but they need to > be meaningful. This is usual. > Your automated patches add noise without any real benefit. Are you expecting a kind of special proof? > You was suggested to be ignored in MTD mailing list exactly > for this type of patches, Will the acceptance increase a bit for similar issues over time? > did you learn anything from that experience? Will another acknowledgement by Selvin Xavier influence any corresponding software improvements? How do you think about to add any further constructive comments also for the other proposed update steps? Regards, Markus