From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
<konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/gntdev: Don't allocate struct gntdev_copy_batch on stack
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:50:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56994D79.1010702@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452887025-27285-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
On 15/01/16 19:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> struct gntdev_copy_batch is over 1300 bytes in size, we shouldn't
> put it on stack.
>
> Some compilers (e.g. 5.2.1) complain:
> drivers/xen/gntdev.c: In function ‘gntdev_ioctl_grant_copy.isra.5’:
> drivers/xen/gntdev.c:949:1: warning: the frame size of 1416 bytes
> is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> index dc49538..43a2c1c 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
> @@ -915,15 +915,19 @@ static int gntdev_grant_copy_seg(struct gntdev_copy_batch *batch,
> static long gntdev_ioctl_grant_copy(struct gntdev_priv *priv, void __user *u)
> {
> struct ioctl_gntdev_grant_copy copy;
> - struct gntdev_copy_batch batch;
> + struct gntdev_copy_batch *batch;
> unsigned int i;
> int ret = 0;
>
> if (copy_from_user(©, u, sizeof(copy)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - batch.nr_ops = 0;
> - batch.nr_pages = 0;
> + batch = kmalloc(sizeof(*batch), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!batch)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + batch->nr_ops = 0;
> + batch->nr_pages = 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < copy.count; i++) {
> struct gntdev_grant_copy_segment seg;
> @@ -933,18 +937,20 @@ static long gntdev_ioctl_grant_copy(struct gntdev_priv *priv, void __user *u)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - ret = gntdev_grant_copy_seg(&batch, &seg, ©.segments[i].status);
> + ret = gntdev_grant_copy_seg(batch, &seg,
> + ©.segments[i].status);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
>
> cond_resched();
> }
> - if (batch.nr_ops)
> - ret = gntdev_copy(&batch);
> + if (batch->nr_ops)
> + ret = gntdev_copy(batch);
You presumably want a kfree() here?
> return ret;
>
> out:
> - gntdev_put_pages(&batch);
> + gntdev_put_pages(batch);
> + kfree(batch);
> return ret;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-15 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-15 19:43 [PATCH] xen/gntdev: Don't allocate struct gntdev_copy_batch on stack Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-15 19:50 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2016-01-15 19:53 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-18 11:11 ` David Vrabel
2016-01-19 14:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-19 14:31 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56994D79.1010702@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).