From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Cc: knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
marex@denx.de, marxin.liska@gmail.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: light: acpi-als: Report data as processed
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:02:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569A3F7C.2050400@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452612099-26630-1-git-send-email-gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
On 12/01/16 15:21, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> As per the ACPI specification (Revision 5.0) [1], the data coming
> from the sensor represent the ambient light illuminance reading
> expressed in lux. So use IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED to signify that
> the data are pre-processed.
>
> However, to keep backward ABI compatibility, the IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW
> bit is not removed.
>
> [1] http://www.acpi.info/DOWNLOADS/ACPIspec50.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Applied to the fixes-togreg branch and marked for stable.
I added a bit to the commit message including that bug report you found for
iio-sensor-proxy as additional justification for the stable marking
and sending it as a fix.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
> index 60537ec..53201d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,9 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec acpi_als_channels[] = {
> .realbits = 32,
> .storagebits = 32,
> },
> - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> + /* _RAW is here for backward ABI compatibility */
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED),
> },
> };
>
> @@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ static int acpi_als_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> s32 temp_val;
> int ret;
>
> - if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> + if ((mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED) && (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* we support only illumination (_ALI) so far. */
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-16 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 15:21 [PATCH] iio: light: acpi-als: Report data as processed rather than raw Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-01-09 16:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-01-09 17:27 ` Marek Vasut
2016-01-11 19:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-01-11 19:20 ` Marek Vasut
2016-01-12 0:15 ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-01-12 15:27 ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-01-16 12:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-01-11 10:16 ` Crt Mori
2016-01-11 19:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-01-12 15:21 ` [PATCH v2] iio: light: acpi-als: Report data as processed Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-01-16 13:02 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569A3F7C.2050400@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=gabriele.mzt@gmail.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=marxin.liska@gmail.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).