From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S934987AbcATRGI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:06:08 -0500
Received: from mail1.bemta8.messagelabs.com ([216.82.243.197]:36615 "EHLO
	mail1.bemta8.messagelabs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934792AbcATRGD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:06:03 -0500
X-Env-Sender: Marc_Gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-220.messagelabs.com!1453309560!27326374!1
X-Originating-IP: [195.215.56.170]
X-StarScan-Received: 
X-StarScan-Version: 7.35.1; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] irqchip: Add support for Tango interrupt
 controller
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
CC: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
References: <569CE0F2.1060507@sigmadesigns.com>
 <569D0B80.1010908@sigmadesigns.com> <569D165E.4060004@sigmadesigns.com>
 <569FAFF5.4090909@arm.com> <yw1xr3hcqlix.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
 <569FB4AE.8000506@sigmadesigns.com> <20160120170219.GC28169@leverpostej>
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
Message-ID: <569FBE76.10609@sigmadesigns.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:05:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160120170219.GC28169@leverpostej>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.27.0.114]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 20/01/2016 18:02, Mark Rutland wrote:

> When you put together the binding document, please point out that the
> ranges property is necessary.

I don't quite understand.

Can I write the node without a ranges property, and the driver would
still function correctly?

Regards.