From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - add async support to algif_aead
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:18:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <569FEB90.5020203@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119003428.GA5571@gondor.apana.org.au>
Hi Herbert,
On 01/18/2016 04:34 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> My understanding is that the sock_kmalloc is mainly used for allocations
>> > of the user provided data, because it keeps tracks of how much memory
>> > is allocated by a socket, and makes sure that is will not exceed the
>> > sysctl_optmem_max limit. Usually the internal structures, with fixed
>> > size are allocated simply with kmalloc. I don't think that using
>> > sock_kmalloc will give us any benefit here.
> If there is only ever one of them per-socket then kmalloc is fine,
> otherwise you should use sock_kmalloc.
>
I tried sock_kmalloc and it will not work. The sysctl_optmem_max by
default is 20480 bytes. The aead ctx by itself takes more than half of
it (11832 bytes). A single async request takes 11408 bytes.
It means we need to use kmalloc or no async request could be allocated.
I would opt to go with this version and I'll convert both algif_aead
and algif_skcipher to use sock_hold later.
Thanks,
--
TS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-20 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-15 19:21 [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - add async support to algif_aead Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-17 15:07 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-01-18 15:22 ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-19 0:34 ` Herbert Xu
2016-01-19 15:18 ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-20 20:18 ` Tadeusz Struk [this message]
2016-01-21 5:00 ` Herbert Xu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-27 22:10 Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-27 22:29 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-27 22:41 ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-28 6:26 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-01-28 16:00 ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-28 17:09 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-01-28 17:30 ` Tadeusz Struk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=569FEB90.5020203@intel.com \
--to=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=tstruk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).