linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - add async support to algif_aead
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 12:18:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569FEB90.5020203@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160119003428.GA5571@gondor.apana.org.au>

Hi Herbert,
On 01/18/2016 04:34 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> My understanding is that the sock_kmalloc is mainly used for allocations
>> > of the user provided  data, because it keeps tracks of how much memory
>> > is allocated by a socket, and makes sure that is will not exceed the
>> > sysctl_optmem_max limit. Usually the internal structures, with fixed
>> > size are allocated simply with kmalloc. I don't think that using
>> > sock_kmalloc will give us any benefit here.
> If there is only ever one of them per-socket then kmalloc is fine,
> otherwise you should use sock_kmalloc.
> 

I tried sock_kmalloc and it will not work. The sysctl_optmem_max by
default is 20480 bytes. The aead ctx by itself takes more than half of
it (11832 bytes). A single async request takes 11408 bytes.
It means we need to use kmalloc or no async request could be allocated.
I would opt to go with this version and I'll convert both algif_aead
and algif_skcipher to use sock_hold later.
Thanks,

-- 
TS

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-15 19:21 [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - add async support to algif_aead Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-17 15:07 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-01-18 15:22   ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-19  0:34     ` Herbert Xu
2016-01-19 15:18       ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-20 20:18       ` Tadeusz Struk [this message]
2016-01-21  5:00         ` Herbert Xu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-27 22:10 Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-27 22:29 ` kbuild test robot
2016-01-27 22:41   ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-28  6:26 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-01-28 16:00   ` Tadeusz Struk
2016-01-28 17:09     ` Stephan Mueller
2016-01-28 17:30       ` Tadeusz Struk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569FEB90.5020203@intel.com \
    --to=tadeusz.struk@intel.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smueller@chronox.de \
    --cc=tstruk@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).